Author
Listed:
- Adam Booth
(School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)
- Philip James
(School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)
- Stephen McGough
(School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)
- Ellis Solaiman
(School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)
Abstract
Accurately forecasting air quality could lead to the development of dynamic, data-driven policy-making and improved early warning detection systems. Deep learning has demonstrated the potential to produce highly accurate forecasting models, but it is noted that much literature focuses on narrow datasets and typically considers one geographic area. In this research, three diverse air quality datasets are utilised to evaluate four deep learning algorithms, which are feedforward neural networks, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) recurrent neural networks, DeepAR and Temporal Fusion Transformers (TFTs). The study uses these modules to forecast CO, NO 2 , O 3 , and particulate matter 2.5 and 10 (PM 2.5 , PM 10 ) individually, producing a 24 h forecast for a given sensor and pollutant. Each model is optimised using a hyperparameter and a feature selection process, evaluating the utility of exogenous data such as meteorological data, including wind speed and temperature, along with the inclusion of other pollutants. The findings show that the TFT and DeepAR algorithms achieve superior performance over their simpler counterparts, though they may prove challenging in practical applications. It is noted that while some covariates such as CO are important covariates for predicting NO 2 across all three datasets, other parameters such as context length proved inconsistent across the three areas, suggesting that parameters such as context length are location and pollutant specific.
Suggested Citation
Adam Booth & Philip James & Stephen McGough & Ellis Solaiman, 2025.
"Cross-Regional Deep Learning for Air Quality Forecasting: A Comparative Study of CO, NO 2 , O 3 , PM 2.5 , and PM 10,"
Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-25, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jforec:v:7:y:2025:i:4:p:66-:d:1788010
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:7:y:2025:i:4:p:66-:d:1788010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.