IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jfinte/v5y2026i3p65-d2000175.html

Formal Harmonization, Persistent Accounting Uncertainty: Practitioner Evidence on Crypto-Asset Valuation After MiCA in Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Miroslav Škoda

    (Department of Management and Economics, DTI University, Sládkovičova 533/20, 018 41 Dubnica nad Váhom, Slovakia)

  • Viera Guzoňová

    (Department of Management and Economics, DTI University, Sládkovičova 533/20, 018 41 Dubnica nad Váhom, Slovakia)

Abstract

The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) harmonizes market rules across the European Union, but it does not itself determine how entities should classify, measure, document, and tax crypto-asset transactions. This study examines whether Slovakia’s recent implementation measures have translated formal harmonization into operational accounting clarity. An anonymous online survey of 34 accounting, tax, finance, and business professionals recruited through purposive and convenience sampling was analyzed using counts, percentages, a descriptive cross-tabulation with Cramér’s V, and a documented but limited coding of two open-ended items. Because the sample is small and non-probability, all results are interpreted as indicative of the observed respondents rather than as population estimates. In the sample, 52.9% assessed the direction of legislative development positively, 72.7% of valid respondents considered current valuation rules inadequate, 60.6% reported that the reforms had not increased accounting clarity, and 60.6% perceived greater uncertainty. Tax obligations (50.0%) and record-keeping and documentation (35.3%) were selected more often than bookkeeping mechanics (14.7%). Practical experience co-varied with legislative monitoring in the realized sample (Cramér’s V = 0.62), although no population-inferential p -values or confidence intervals are reported. The pattern suggests a regulatory–operational clarity gap: legal taxonomy and market supervision have advanced faster than implementable valuation and documentation guidance. The proposed implementation framework combines survey indications with regulatory analysis, prior literature, and the authors’ professional judgment; it is a non-ranked proposal for consultation and further testing rather than a set of empirically validated policy priorities. Although derived from Slovakia, the framework is relevant to other EU jurisdictions translating MiCA’s common market rules into national accounting and tax practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Miroslav Škoda & Viera Guzoňová, 2026. "Formal Harmonization, Persistent Accounting Uncertainty: Practitioner Evidence on Crypto-Asset Valuation After MiCA in Slovakia," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:5:y:2026:i:3:p:65-:d:2000175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/5/3/65/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/5/3/65/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:5:y:2026:i:3:p:65-:d:2000175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.