IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jfinte/v5y2026i3p59-d1982568.html

Stablecoin and Bitcoin as Macro-Financial Instruments: Evidence from the Brazilian Digital Asset Market

Author

Listed:
  • Rubens Moura de Carvalho

    (Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Cledilson Viana

    (Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

This study examines whether stablecoin and Bitcoin transaction volumes in Brazil are associated with domestic macroeconomic conditions. Using monthly data from August 2019 to December 2025, the analysis compares the association of domestic economic activity, proxied by the IBCBr, and the BRLUSD exchange rate with the transaction volumes of stablecoins and Bitcoin reported in the open data records of the Receita Federal do Brasil, the Brazilian Tax Administration. The empirical strategy distinguishes between long-run relationships in log levels and short-run dynamics in log differences, applies Johansen cointegration and ARDL bounds testing, and estimates an error correction model for stablecoins. Global crypto market controls are used as complementary measures to assess the contrast between the two assets. The results show that stablecoin transaction volume is positively and significantly associated with Brazilian economic activity in both long-run and short-run specifications and that this association is not explained by global stablecoin activity. The exchange rate is associated with stablecoin volume mainly through a structural long-run channel rather than immediate monthly effects. In contrast, Bitcoin transaction volume does not exhibit a robust association with domestic economic activity and is instead more strongly associated with global Bitcoin volume. The findings suggest that stablecoins may act as a domestically embedded macro-financial instrument in Brazil. This finding reflects transactional demand, liquidity management, or demand for dollar-linked assets, whereas Bitcoin behaves as a more globally oriented and comparatively detached digital asset. This distinction has important implications for policy, as stablecoins may have stronger implications for monetary transmission, digital dollarisation, and financial intermediation than Bitcoin-focused analyses indicate.

Suggested Citation

  • Rubens Moura de Carvalho & Cledilson Viana, 2026. "Stablecoin and Bitcoin as Macro-Financial Instruments: Evidence from the Brazilian Digital Asset Market," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:5:y:2026:i:3:p:59-:d:1982568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/5/3/59/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/5/3/59/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:5:y:2026:i:3:p:59-:d:1982568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.