IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jfinte/v5y2026i3p57-d1980307.html

Financial Digital Twins and Conversational AI in Robo-Advisory: Evidence from a Scenario-Based Randomized Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Marco I. Bonelli

    (Venice School of Management, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, San Giobbe, Cannaregio 873, Fondamenta San Gi-obbe, 30121 Venice, Italy)

Abstract

Robo-advisors have expanded access to automated investment services, but many platforms continue to rely on relatively static onboarding procedures and limited forms of user interaction. This study examines how participants with investment experience respond to two next-generation robo-advisory design features: financial digital twins, understood as dynamic investor profiles that integrate goals, risk tolerance, cash-flow patterns, and anticipated life events, and conversational artificial intelligence (AI), understood as an interactive interface for explaining recommendations. Using a scenario-based randomized 2 × 2 online experiment, 336 adult respondents with self-reported investment experience, recruited through professional and academic networks, were assigned to one of four robo-advisor scenarios that varied the personalization architecture, standard profile versus digital twin, and the interface style, plain dashboard versus conversational AI, while holding the portfolio recommendation constant. The results show that digital-twin personalization increases perceived personalization and privacy concern, indicating that more adaptive advisory architectures may be viewed as both more relevant and more data-intensive. Conversational AI increases the perceived interactive quality of the advisory experience, while selected willingness-related patterns, especially in the combined digital-twin and conversational-AI condition, are treated as exploratory because several secondary composites displayed limited internal consistency. The strongest confirmatory emphasis is therefore placed on perceived personalization and privacy concern, and the remaining findings are best interpreted as scenario-based investor responses rather than evidence of actual adoption behavior or confirmed psychological mechanisms. The study contributes to behavioral FinTech research by clarifying the personalization–privacy tension in AI-enabled robo-advisory services and by offering design implications for more transparent, interactive, and responsibly personalized digital wealth-management systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco I. Bonelli, 2026. "Financial Digital Twins and Conversational AI in Robo-Advisory: Evidence from a Scenario-Based Randomized Experiment," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:5:y:2026:i:3:p:57-:d:1980307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/5/3/57/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/5/3/57/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:5:y:2026:i:3:p:57-:d:1980307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.