Author
Listed:
- Jekaterina Kuzmina
(BA School of Business and Finance, University of Latvia, Kr.Valdemara Str. 161, LV-1010 Riga, Latvia)
- Inese Mavļutova
(BA School of Business and Finance, University of Latvia, Kr.Valdemara Str. 161, LV-1010 Riga, Latvia)
- Atis Verdenhofs
(BA School of Business and Finance, University of Latvia, Kr.Valdemara Str. 161, LV-1010 Riga, Latvia)
- Andris Fomins
(BA School of Business and Finance, University of Latvia, Kr.Valdemara Str. 161, LV-1010 Riga, Latvia)
- Andris Nātriņš
(BA School of Business and Finance, University of Latvia, Kr.Valdemara Str. 161, LV-1010 Riga, Latvia)
Abstract
This study assesses how a country’s digitalization impacts sustainability indicators as measured by unmonitored environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks, which serve as a proxy for the development of financial technology (FinTech). The study employs a cross-country approach using data for up to 163 countries, going beyond the firm-level focus of previous studies. The DiGiX Digitalization Index and the ICT Development Index are used to measure digital maturity, while pillar-level indicators and Sustainalytics ESG country risk scores are used to assess ESG indicators. With evidence of nonlinear, threshold-type effects at higher levels of digital maturity, the regression results suggest a strong negative correlation between digital maturity and ESG risk. Different country typologies are further identified using unsupervised cluster analysis, which reveals a continuous digital and ESG gradient in environmental, social and governance aspects. The analysis proves digital maturity serves as a systemic enabler of ESG risk management by strengthening data availability, governance capacity and policy enforcement. These findings provide policy-related guidance for coordinating digitalization strategies in line with the Sustainable Development Goals.
Suggested Citation
Jekaterina Kuzmina & Inese Mavļutova & Atis Verdenhofs & Andris Fomins & Andris Nātriņš, 2026.
"Digital Financial Innovation and Sustainable Development: Cross-Countries Analysis and ESG Risks Management,"
FinTech, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-26, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:5:y:2026:i:2:p:48-:d:1957186
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:5:y:2026:i:2:p:48-:d:1957186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.