IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jfinte/v5y2026i2p41-d1936553.html

Transparency by Design: A Narrative Synthesis of AI Disclosure, Explainability, and Trust in Consumer-Facing FinTech

Author

Listed:
  • Stefanos Balaskas

    (eGovernment & eCommerce Lab (Innovation & Entrepreneurship), Department of Business Administration, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is increasingly embedded in consumer-facing FinTech, but trust in AI-enabled finance depends not only on performance, but also on whether users can understand and appropriately evaluate algorithmic outputs. This review synthesizes research on AI disclosure, explainability, and related transparency cues in consumer-facing FinTech, with particular attention to whether these cues support trust calibration rather than merely increasing trust or adoption. Searches in Scopus and Web of Science identified nine formally included studies and six adjacent contextual studies. The available evidence base is concentrated in robo-advisory and adjacent AI-enabled investment advising, with only limited evidence on automated credit decisions and crowdfunding recommendation platforms. The most studied cues are explanation/explainable AI and broader advisory or platform transparency, whereas disclosure, responsibility attribution, user control, and information-quality cues remain underexamined. Across the formal corpus, transparency cues are generally associated with more positive trust-related outcomes, especially trust and adoption-oriented responses. However, only a small subset of studies addresses trust calibration through outcomes such as reliance, fairness, accountability, and contestability. Overall, the current literature supports transparency more strongly as an acceptance mechanism than as a basis for appropriately bounded trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefanos Balaskas, 2026. "Transparency by Design: A Narrative Synthesis of AI Disclosure, Explainability, and Trust in Consumer-Facing FinTech," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-34, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:5:y:2026:i:2:p:41-:d:1936553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/5/2/41/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/5/2/41/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:5:y:2026:i:2:p:41-:d:1936553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.