IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jfinte/v4y2025i3p44-d1732816.html

Determinants of FinTech Payment Services Adoption—An Empirical Study of Lithuanian Businesses

Author

Listed:
  • Greta Marcevičiūtė

    (Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Kamilė Taujanskaitė

    (Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Jens Kai Perret

    (Department of Economics & Quantitative Methods, International School of Management, Im MediaPark 5c, 50667 Cologne, Germany)

Abstract

The new era of FinTech services enabled the financial sector to benefit from innovative and cost-effective products via process automation, fostering a foundation for more sustainable business growth. Despite considerable research, the determinants of FinTech services adoption by businesses remain mostly unknown. For the first time, a mixed-method study is realized combining the perspectives of FinTech services providers (experts) and FinTech service users (businesses that use FinTech). To elicit the providers’ views, interviews have been conducted with experts from FinTech service providers. From the user side, data generated via online surveys was evaluated in an adjusted Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) model tailored to FinTech specifics using the R implementation of PLS-SEM. The results of this analysis enabled comparisons between the perspectives of providers and users to identify similarities and differences in adoption factors. Correspondingly, conclusions on FinTech adoption encourage FinTech service providers to adjust their solutions to better fit the business requirements. For business owners, they provide valuable insights on how to streamline their financials and foster sustainable growth through efficiency gains.

Suggested Citation

  • Greta Marcevičiūtė & Kamilė Taujanskaitė & Jens Kai Perret, 2025. "Determinants of FinTech Payment Services Adoption—An Empirical Study of Lithuanian Businesses," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:4:y:2025:i:3:p:44-:d:1732816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/4/3/44/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/4/3/44/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cephas Paa Kwasi Coffie & Hongjiang Zhao & Isaac Adjei Mensah, 2020. "Panel Econometric Analysis on Mobile Payment Transactions and Traditional Banks Effort toward Financial Accessibility in Sub-Sahara Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Oliver Werth & Davinia Rodríguez Cardona & Albert Torno & Michael H. Breitner & Jan Muntermann, 2023. "What determines FinTech success?—A taxonomy-based analysis of FinTech success factors," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Huarng, Kun-Huang & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang, 2022. "Causal complexity analysis for fintech adoption at the country level," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 228-234.
    4. Na Song & Isaac Appiah-Otoo, 2022. "The Impact of Fintech on Economic Growth: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Jadil, Yassine & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2021. "A meta-analysis of the UTAUT model in the mobile banking literature: The moderating role of sample size and culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 354-372.
    6. Cephas Paa Kwasi Coffie & Zhao Hongjiang & Isaac Adjei Mensah & Rebecca Kiconco & Abraham Emuron Otim Simon, 2021. "Determinants of FinTech payment services diffusion by SMEs in Sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from Ghana," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 539-560, July.
    7. Nenad Tomić & Zoran Kalinić & Violeta Todorović, 2023. "Using the UTAUT model to analyze user intention to accept electronic payment systems in Serbia," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 22(2), pages 251-270, May.
    8. Shivani Inder & Kiran Sood & Simon Grima, 2022. "Antecedents of Behavioural Intention to Adopt Internet Banking Using Structural Equation Modelling," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sérgio Ricardo Tavares da Silva & Arnaldo Fernandes de Matos Coelho & Catarina Alexandra Neves Proença, 2026. "Drivers of FinTech adoption: a bibliometric approach," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 1-35, December.
    2. Ge, Wenfeng & Yang, Ping & Pan, Xu & Ran, Qiying, 2024. "Sustainable utilization of mining resources: Exploring the impact of FinTech on green development from the perspective of mining enterprises," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Zhu, Linna & Gao, Yong, 2026. "How does digital finance shape technological upgrading in the agricultural industry: The roles of FinTech, total factor productivity, and fiscal expenditure," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Anna Crisci & Luana Serino & Francesco Campanella, 2024. "Graphical diagnostics in proportional odds models—Empirical study on determinants of FinTech payment service diffusion by SMEs in Italy," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 5755-5776, December.
    5. Rizvi, Syed Kumail Abbas & Rahat, Birjees & Naqvi, Bushra & Umar, Muhammad, 2024. "Revolutionizing finance: The synergy of fintech, digital adoption, and innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    6. Li, Chengming & Wang, Yilin & Zhou, Zhihan & Wang, Zeyu & Mardani, Abbas, 2023. "Digital finance and enterprise financing constraints: Structural characteristics and mechanism identification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Md Mohan Uddin & Khandker Md Nahin Mamun & Abdul Hannan Chowdhury, 2025. "Understanding pragmatic meanings of fintech among vulnerable consumers in Bangladesh for enhanced customer experience management," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 30(4), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Mohammad Tarique & Zia Malik, 2025. "Asymmetric Impact of Digital Finance on Poverty and Income Inequality Using NARDL Approach: Evidence from Indonesia," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(5), pages 16211-16236, November.
    9. Liu, Dongwang & Yang, Ziqi, 2024. "Asymmetric linkages among fintech, oil prices, governance, and growth in Southeast Asian economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    10. Fahimeh Khatami & Enrico Cagno & Luboš Smrčka & Zoltan Rozsa, 2024. "Assessing the role of FinTech in entrepreneurial ecosystems at the international level," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 3373-3402, December.
    11. Sumita Jagdishprasad Shroff & Rajkumari Nitin Soni & Simran Rohira, 2026. "Digital currency usage intention among existing fintech users: testing the modified UTAUT using hybrid SEM-ANN approach," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(1), pages 1-27, March.
    12. Yuzhen Ma & Xinyang Wei & Gaoyun Yan & Xiaoyu He, 2023. "The Impact of Fintech Development on Air Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Song, Yi & Hao, Yuqing, 2024. "Understanding the relationship between Fintech, Natural Resources, Green Finance, and Environmental Sustainability in China: A BARDL approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    14. Hyun-Sun Ryu, 2025. "From Innovation to Use: Configurational Pathways to High Fintech Use Across User Groups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-28, August.
    15. Aydın Gürbüz & Meltem Kılıç & Emre Tatlıyer, 2024. "The Impact of Fintech on Economic Growth: Evidence from Panels of Turkic and Southeast Asian Countries," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 53(2), pages 229-248, September.
    16. Cao, Lei & Wang, Guosong, 2024. "Impact of digital finance on agricultural output: From the perspective of digital development of agriculture," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    17. Horim Kim & Jaeyoung Kim & Kyungmyung Jang & Jaemin Han, 2020. "Are the Blockchain-Based Patents Sustainable for Increasing Firm Value?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Carè, Rosella & Boitan, Iustina Alina & Stoian, Andreea Maria & Fatima, Rabia, 2025. "Exploring the landscape of financial inclusion through the lens of financial technologies: A review," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Lou, Runchi & Wang, Fuhao, 2023. "Digital financial inclusion and poverty alleviation: Evidence from the sustainable development of China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 418-434.
    20. Wei Jiang & Yanhui Hu & Hongjie Cao, 2024. "Does Digital Financial Inclusion Increase the Household Consumption? Evidence from China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 17333-17364, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:4:y:2025:i:3:p:44-:d:1732816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.