IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v9y2016i8p632-d75797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

TBM/MTM for HTS-FNSF: An Innovative Testing Strategy to Qualify/Validate Fusion Technologies for U.S. DEMO

Author

Listed:
  • Laila El-Guebaly

    (Department of Engineering Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1500 Engineering Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA)

  • Arthur Rowcliffe

    (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA)

  • Jonathan Menard

    (Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, 100 Stellarator Road, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA)

  • Thomas Brown

    (Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, 100 Stellarator Road, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA)

Abstract

The qualification and validation of nuclear technologies are daunting tasks for fusion demonstration (DEMO) and power plants. This is particularly true for advanced designs that involve harsh radiation environment with 14 MeV neutrons and high-temperature operating regimes. This paper outlines the unique qualification and validation processes developed in the U.S., offering the only access to the complete fusion environment, focusing on the most prominent U.S. blanket concept (the dual cooled PbLi (DCLL)) along with testing new generations of structural and functional materials in dedicated test modules. The venue for such activities is the proposed Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF), which is viewed as an essential element of the U.S. fusion roadmap. A staged blanket testing strategy has been developed to test and enhance the DCLL blanket performance during each phase of FNSF D-T operation. A materials testing module (MTM) is critically important to include in the FNSF as well to test a broad range of specimens of future, more advanced generations of materials in a relevant fusion environment. The most important attributes for MTM are the relevant He/dpa ratio (10–15) and the much larger specimen volumes compared to the 10–500 mL range available in the International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility (IFMIF) and European DEMO-Oriented Neutron Source (DONES).

Suggested Citation

  • Laila El-Guebaly & Arthur Rowcliffe & Jonathan Menard & Thomas Brown, 2016. "TBM/MTM for HTS-FNSF: An Innovative Testing Strategy to Qualify/Validate Fusion Technologies for U.S. DEMO," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:8:p:632-:d:75797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/8/632/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/8/632/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:8:p:632-:d:75797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.