IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v19y2026i6p1490-d1896253.html

Simulation Tools for Renewable Energy Communities: A Comparative Multi-Scenario Analysis in Residential Contexts with High Energy Sharing Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Presciutti

    (Faculty of Technological and Innovation Sciences, University Mercatorum, P.za E. Mattei, 10, 00186 Rome, Italy)

  • Lucia Fagotti

    (CIRIAF (Interuniversity Research Centre on Pollution and Environment “Mauro Felli”), University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 67, 06125 Perugia, Italy)

  • Laura Martiniello

    (Faculty of Technological and Innovation Sciences, University Mercatorum, P.za E. Mattei, 10, 00186 Rome, Italy)

  • Elisa Moretti

    (Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 93, 06132 Perugia, Italy)

Abstract

Renewable Energy Communities (RECs) represent a key instrument for enabling decentralized energy systems and enhancing local renewable energy utilization. Preliminary assessment of REC performance relies on simulation tools that differ in computational complexity, assumptions, and input data. Despite the growing literature, a systematic comparison of tools applied to identical community configurations is still missing. This study provides a systematic cross-comparison of four tools representing different modelling paradigms: a VBA-based prefeasibility model (MERCm), a MATLAB-based detailed framework (UNIPGm), a national open-access simulator (RECON), and a commercial platform (COMMm). The tools were applied to six residential configurations in three Italian provinces representing different solar irradiation levels. Scenarios are defined to ensure high energy sharing potential, considering a ratio of shared energy to energy fed into the grid above 60%. Key performance indicators, including physical self-consumption and shared energy, are analyzed. Results show broadly consistent trends across tools, although these findings refer to PV-only, residential RECs and may differ in more complex community configurations, with coefficients of variation below 15% for most relevant indicators, particularly shared energy, while confirming that differences in input data and modelling assumptions can still influence outcomes. These findings support the reliability of simplified simulation tools for preliminary REC feasibility assessments and provide guidance for policymakers and technical operators.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Presciutti & Lucia Fagotti & Laura Martiniello & Elisa Moretti, 2026. "Simulation Tools for Renewable Energy Communities: A Comparative Multi-Scenario Analysis in Residential Contexts with High Energy Sharing Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:19:y:2026:i:6:p:1490-:d:1896253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/19/6/1490/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/19/6/1490/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:19:y:2026:i:6:p:1490-:d:1896253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.