IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v19y2026i6p1465-d1893282.html

Research on Mechanism-Based Modeling and Simulation of Heavy-Duty Industrial Gas Turbines

Author

Listed:
  • Bingzhou Ma

    (Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System, College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
    Jiangsu Huaiyin Power Generation Co., Ltd., Huai’an 223002, China)

  • Haoran An

    (Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System, College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China)

  • Hongyi Chen

    (Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System, College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China)

  • Feng Lu

    (Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System, College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China)

  • Jinquan Huang

    (Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System, College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China)

  • Qiuhong Li

    (Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System, College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China)

Abstract

This study investigates mechanism-based modeling and simulation of a single-shaft heavy-duty industrial gas turbine. Taking the PG9171E gas turbine as the case study, component-level steady-state and dynamic models are developed. The steady-state model is established using the constant mass flow (CMF) method. For dynamic modeling, both the CMF approach and the inter-component volume (ICV) approach are implemented to enable a comparative assessment of the two methods. On the basis of the steady-state model, an improved Dung Beetle Optimization (DBO) algorithm is proposed to perform model correction using measured operational data from the gas turbine. After model correction, the maximum relative error between the simulated results and the measured operating data is reduced to 1.01 × 10 −5 %. Following high-accuracy model correction, sensitivity analysis and a comparative dynamic study are conducted for the two dynamic modeling approaches. The results indicate that the most influential sensitivity parameter is the rotor rotational inertia, followed by the virtual volume of the combustor. Moreover, the primary discrepancy between the ICV and CMF approaches arises from differences in the operating trajectories on component characteristic maps. The ICV-based model exhibits a pronounced response lag; however, it requires less computational time than the CMF-based model, making it more suitable for rapid engineering simulation and practical applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Bingzhou Ma & Haoran An & Hongyi Chen & Feng Lu & Jinquan Huang & Qiuhong Li, 2026. "Research on Mechanism-Based Modeling and Simulation of Heavy-Duty Industrial Gas Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-34, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:19:y:2026:i:6:p:1465-:d:1893282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/19/6/1465/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/19/6/1465/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:19:y:2026:i:6:p:1465-:d:1893282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.