IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v19y2026i4p1024-d1865645.html

Governance Quality and Renewable Energy Transition: Global Evidence Using Panel ARDL

Author

Listed:
  • Oksana Liashenko

    (Loughborough Business School, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
    Faculty of Economics and Management, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, 43-025 Lutsk, Ukraine)

  • Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, West Ukrainian National University, 46-027 Ternopil, Ukraine
    Institute of Public Administration and Business, WSEI University, 20-209 Lublin, Poland)

  • Tomasz Wołowiec

    (Institute of Public Administration and Business, WSEI University, 20-209 Lublin, Poland)

  • Dariusz Woźniak

    (School of Business, National-Louis University, 33-300 Nowy Sącz, Poland)

Abstract

This study analyses the long-run relationship between governance quality and renewable energy development using a global panel of 174 countries over the period 2000–2023. The objective is to assess whether institutional quality systematically influences renewable energy deployment across heterogeneous development contexts. The empirical analysis employs a panel autoregressive distributed lag (PMG-ARDL) framework, which accommodates mixed integration orders and allows for heterogeneous short-run dynamics while imposing homogeneity on long-run coefficients. Renewable energy consumption, measured as the share of renewable energy in total final energy consumption, is modelled as a function of governance quality indicators, economic development, and environmental pressure, with trade openness and foreign direct investment included as control variables. Panel unit root tests indicate a mixture of I(0) and I(1) variables, supporting the use of the ARDL framework, while panel cointegration tests provide strong evidence of a stable long-run relationship in the estimated model. The results reveal a statistically significant long-run association between governance quality and renewable energy development, although the magnitude and direction of the effects vary across governance dimensions and development levels. In contrast, short-run effects are generally weak, suggesting that governance primarily shapes renewable energy outcomes through gradual, structural channels. These findings highlight the importance of institutional quality for long-term energy transition processes and provide empirically grounded insights for the design of energy and governance policies. The analysis reveals significant heterogeneity across development contexts: governance improvements yield positive effects on renewable energy adoption in low-income countries (β = +3.77), where institutional deficits constitute binding constraints, whilst the effect becomes negative in high-income economies (β = −11.87), reflecting diminishing returns and infrastructure lock-in. These findings suggest that developing countries should prioritise governance reforms—particularly Regulatory Quality and Political Stability—to accelerate energy transitions, whereas advanced economies should shift policy attention toward grid modernisation and market design. International organisations should adopt differentiated climate finance strategies matching institutional support to the development stage.

Suggested Citation

  • Oksana Liashenko & Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi & Tomasz Wołowiec & Dariusz Woźniak, 2026. "Governance Quality and Renewable Energy Transition: Global Evidence Using Panel ARDL," Energies, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-28, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:19:y:2026:i:4:p:1024-:d:1865645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/19/4/1024/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/19/4/1024/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:19:y:2026:i:4:p:1024-:d:1865645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.