Author
Listed:
- Lana Kong
(Ahuora Centre for Smart Energy Systems, School of Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3210, New Zealand)
- Florian Schlosser
(Department of Energy System Technologies, Paderborn University, 33098 Paderborn, Germany)
- Steffen Kloeppel
(German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Low-Carbon Industrial Processes, 02763 Zittau, Germany)
- James K. Carson
(Ahuora Centre for Smart Energy Systems, School of Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3210, New Zealand)
- Donald J. Cleland
(School of Food Technology & Natural Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand)
- Timothy Gordon Walmsley
(Ahuora Centre for Smart Energy Systems, School of Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3210, New Zealand)
Abstract
High-temperature heat pumps are a promising pathway for electrifying industrial process heat, but their application to large-temperature-glide duties remains technically challenging. Milk powder spray drying is one such application, requiring air heating to approximately 200 °C while offering only low-to-medium-temperature waste heat sources. Transcritical CO 2 heat pumps are attractive for this duty because the sensible cooling profile of supercritical CO 2 can be matched to the large temperature glide of air heating. However, the high operating pressures required in transcritical CO 2 cycles lead to substantial expansion losses, creating a potential opportunity for expansion work recovery. This study evaluates ejector- and expander-based expansion work recovery in high-temperature transcritical–transcritical CO 2 heat pump cycles for spray dryer air heating. Baseline and modified cycle configurations were modelled using steady-state thermodynamic analysis and compared using heating coefficient of performance, maximum achievable sink temperature, component-level exergy destruction, and discharge-pressure sensitivity. Under the investigated conditions and assumed component efficiencies, expanders improved the COP of all evaluated cycles. TTX-2 achieved a COP of 2.35, 5.4% above its corresponding TT-2 baseline. TT-2 and the external benchmark TT-4 each achieved a COP of 2.23 at 150 bar for the investigated duty. The comparison with TT-4 is a benchmark comparison, not an evaluation of a TT-4 recovery variant. The improvement was modest, and an upper-bound break-even expander cost of approximately 150 EUR/kW of delivered heat was estimated for the most favourable expander case. Ejector cycles reduced expansion losses in some cases but did not provide a clear cycle-level COP improvement because they altered compressor pressure ratios, gas-cooler outlet conditions, and cascade heat transfer performance. These findings apply to the investigated spray dryer duty and demonstrate that reducing expansion exergy destruction alone is insufficient to guarantee improved whole-cycle performance under the stated operating and component-efficiency assumptions.
Suggested Citation
Lana Kong & Florian Schlosser & Steffen Kloeppel & James K. Carson & Donald J. Cleland & Timothy Gordon Walmsley, 2026.
"Transcritical–Transcritical Cascade CO 2 Heat Pump with Expansion Work Recovery: A Thermodynamic Analysis,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-26, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:19:y:2026:i:16:p:3767-:d:2012853
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:19:y:2026:i:16:p:3767-:d:2012853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.