IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v19y2026i16p3744-d2011965.html

ARLOS: Adaptive Forecasting and Risk-Calibrated Load Operation in Distribution Substations Under Distribution Shift

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Carlos Castillo

    (Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería y Aplicadas, Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi, Latacunga 050102, Ecuador)

  • Alba Miranda

    (Facultad de Ingenierías, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Ambato 180103, Ecuador)

  • Jessica N. Castillo

    (Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería y Aplicadas, Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi, Latacunga 050102, Ecuador)

  • Jose E. Naranjo

    (Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería y Aplicadas, Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi, Latacunga 050102, Ecuador)

Abstract

Forecast accuracy alone is an incomplete proxy for operational value when load distributions change. This paper presents ARLOS, an auditable forecast–uncertainty–decision framework that combines static and adaptive XGBoost forecasts, rolling performance monitoring, residual-bootstrap uncertainty, and explicit fixed-margin, quantile, and risk-target operating rules. The evaluation uses 2021 for ex ante training and capacity-proxy definition and 2022–2023 for strictly sequential testing on two Ecuadorian distribution substations under a measured baseline, smooth growth, and intraday structural shift. Under the four shifted station–scenario cases, adaptive fixed-margin operation reduced the weighted operational objective by 24.8–46.0% relative to the static fixed-margin baseline; baseline-regime changes ranged from − 2.5 to 11.2%, showing that adaptation is valuable primarily when mismatch is present rather than universally. A 2 × 2 ablation further shows that adaptation and uncertainty are distinct, non-additive sources of operational value: aggregate normalized cost changes from 0.987 for static/fixed operation to 0.650 for adaptive/fixed, 0.515 for static/quantile, and 0.546 for adaptive/quantile. Realized one-sided exceedance, computed from observed load rather than from the bootstrap sample itself, remains within 0.0039–0.0111 of the target across the controlled cases, while nominal 10–90% interval coverage ranges from 78.0% to 78.6%. A nine-substation deployment check corroborates the calibration and identifies a measured drift episode in which adaptation limits, but does not eliminate, forecast degradation. The results support ARLOS as a transparent framework for studying how adaptation and uncertainty propagate into operational consequences under distribution shift.These contributions align with Sustainable Development Goal 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and Sustainable Development Goal 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure) by supporting more reliable, efficient, and intelligent operation of electricity distribution infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Carlos Castillo & Alba Miranda & Jessica N. Castillo & Jose E. Naranjo, 2026. "ARLOS: Adaptive Forecasting and Risk-Calibrated Load Operation in Distribution Substations Under Distribution Shift," Energies, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:19:y:2026:i:16:p:3744-:d:2011965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/19/16/3744/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/19/16/3744/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:19:y:2026:i:16:p:3744-:d:2011965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.