Author
Listed:
- Wanyong Zhang
(School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)
- Haoda Huang
(School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
School of Engineering and Architecture, University College Cork, College Rd., T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland)
- Kunpeng Liu
(School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)
- Chun Li
(School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)
- Gregorio Iglesias
(School of Engineering and Architecture, University College Cork, College Rd., T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK)
- Musa Bashir
(School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, The Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L69 3GH, UK)
Abstract
Scour-induced degradation of soil–structure interactions (SSIs) may substantially amplify the dynamic response of monopile offshore wind turbines (OWTs) under combined environmental and seismic loads. To clarify this mechanism and provide guidance for the safety assessment of OWT foundations, this study establishes a coupled numerical model considering wind, wave, earthquake, scour, and SSI effects. Based on this model, the DTU 10 MW OWT is selected as the research object, and its dynamic responses are investigated with different scour morphologies, scour depths, earthquake inputs, and selected soil parameter sets. The results show that scour reduces the lateral stiffness of the soil–structure system, shifts the structural natural frequency toward a lower-frequency range, and amplifies the displacement, acceleration, and stress responses under seismic excitation. With the selected M8 earthquake input, the tower top displacement reaches 4.18 m in the global-2D scour case, which is more than twice that in the non-scoured case. Global scour produces stronger response amplification than local scour because it weakens the SSI constraint around the full circumference of the pile. For the selected soil parameter sets and the adopted p–y formulations, the clayey foundation model produces smaller calculated displacement and stress responses than the sandy foundation model, reflecting differences in the prescribed lateral stiffness and ultimate soil resistance. These results provide comparative insights for the seismic assessment and scour-resistant design of monopile OWT foundations.
Suggested Citation
Wanyong Zhang & Haoda Huang & Kunpeng Liu & Chun Li & Gregorio Iglesias & Musa Bashir, 2026.
"Dynamic Response and Load Transfer Mechanisms of Monopile Offshore Wind Turbines Subjected to Scour Effects,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-23, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:19:y:2026:i:15:p:3697-:d:2009532
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:19:y:2026:i:15:p:3697-:d:2009532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.