IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v19y2026i15p3629-d2006246.html

Flow-Tracing-Based Allocation of Congestion-Related Settlement Imbalances in Regional Electricity Markets with Priority-Based Implicit Transmission Rights

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaoxia Jing

    (School of Electric Power Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Wenxiao Li

    (School of Electric Power Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Xiaodong Chen

    (Guangzhou Electric Power Trading Center Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510663, China)

Abstract

In transitional electricity markets that operate without explicit financial or physical transmission rights but retain priority generation schedules and rigidly executed medium- and long-term (MLT) contracts, network congestion gives rise to settlement imbalance funds that are difficult to allocate fairly. This paper proposes an allocation framework that couples proportional-sharing power-flow tracing with priority-based implicit transmission rights (PBITRs). Flow tracing quantifies each transaction’s contribution to the realized flows on constrained lines, while the priority rank converts dispatch and contract-execution rules into a direction-dependent settlement weight. The clearing inputs are produced by a joint 24-period DC optimal power flow over a modified IEEE 30-bus system, and representative off-peak, peak, and flat periods are recalculated by AC optimal power flow to test the robustness of constrained-line identification, contribution ranking, and allocation shares. In the recalculated case study, the daily congestion-surplus pool is CNY 19,380 and the proposed method assigns 60.6% of it to the MLT A-to-C transaction that physically dominates the constrained corridor, compared with 21.1% under energy-proportional allocation. For the balancing congestion charge pool of CNY 42,492, the fund-specific responsibility set excludes the LMP-settled spot increment and the proposed method assigns 81.2% to the MLT A-to-C transaction. Across the three AC-OPF checks, the constrained-line sets coincide with the DC results at the 0.95 loading threshold, the transaction contribution rankings are identical, and the maximum DC-AC share differences are 1.01 percentage points for congestion surplus and 0.72 percentage points for balancing congestion charge. Sensitivity tests over the priority exponent and loading threshold show smooth and interpretable changes. The framework contributes an ex-post, settlement-neutral tool for markets that clear energy with LMPs before tradable transmission rights are introduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaoxia Jing & Wenxiao Li & Xiaodong Chen, 2026. "Flow-Tracing-Based Allocation of Congestion-Related Settlement Imbalances in Regional Electricity Markets with Priority-Based Implicit Transmission Rights," Energies, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:19:y:2026:i:15:p:3629-:d:2006246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/19/15/3629/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/19/15/3629/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:19:y:2026:i:15:p:3629-:d:2006246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.