IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v19y2025i1p14-d1822186.html

Green Recovery and the Reorganization of Energy Policy Instruments: Global Lessons from Post-Pandemic Renewable Energy Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Dinh-Tien Luong

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 807618, Taiwan)

  • Thi-Thu-Thao Ha

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 807618, Taiwan)

  • Chia-Nan Wang

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 807618, Taiwan)

  • Jui-Chan Huang

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 807618, Taiwan)

  • Ming-Hung Shu

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 807618, Taiwan)

Abstract

Following the World Health Organization’s 2023 declaration, which ended the global health emergency, energy policy shifted from a short-term crisis response to a structural recovery focused on renewable energy. However, the current literature remains fragmented, often overlooking the realities of implementation in the Global South and failing to integrate diverse policy instruments. This study examines post-pandemic renewable recovery strategies to categorize instruments, evaluate effectiveness, and identify critical implementation gaps. An integrative review was conducted, combining bibliometric mapping of 113 documents (n = 113) and systematic thematic synthesis of 42 studies (n = 42), utilizing the SPIDER and PRISMA protocols. Policy instruments were classified into five groups: Recovery (REC), Fiscal/Financial (FISC), Regulatory (REG), Energy Efficiency (EE), and Social and Information (SOC), revealing a “Global North-South Asymmetry”, where advanced economies leverage fiscal–regulatory coupling while emerging markets face administrative bottlenecks. Findings identify coordination failures, such as missequencing, and propose a “Cascading Policy Logic” that prioritizes de-risking before mandatory standardization. This research bridges the evidence gap by validating the need for informal sector mechanisms and equity safeguards in developing nations. Ultimately, this review provides a strategic framework for policymakers to transition from a reactive stimulus to durable, socially legitimate decarbonization pathways beyond 2025.

Suggested Citation

  • Dinh-Tien Luong & Thi-Thu-Thao Ha & Chia-Nan Wang & Jui-Chan Huang & Ming-Hung Shu, 2025. "Green Recovery and the Reorganization of Energy Policy Instruments: Global Lessons from Post-Pandemic Renewable Energy Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-36, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:14-:d:1822186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/19/1/14/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/19/1/14/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:14-:d:1822186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.