Author
Listed:
- Omid Gholami Banadkoki
(Biomass and Bioenergy Research Group (BBRG), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
Chemical and Biological Engineering Department, Faculty of Applied Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada)
- Shahab Sokhansanj
(Biomass and Bioenergy Research Group (BBRG), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
Chemical and Biological Engineering Department, Faculty of Applied Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada)
- Anthony Lau
(Biomass and Bioenergy Research Group (BBRG), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
Chemical and Biological Engineering Department, Faculty of Applied Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada)
Abstract
Agricultural residues serve as a vast yet underutilized biomass resource with significant potential for bioenergy and biomaterial applications. Converting these residues into densified biomass pellets enhances energy density, handling efficiency, and transportability, offering a sustainable alternative to conventional feedstocks. While extensive research has focused on woody biomass, studies on the pelletization of vegetable crop foliage remain limited. This study examines the pelletability of foliage from corn, soybean, tomato, eggplant, cucumber, and summer squash, assessing their physical properties, bulk durability, bulk density, and energy consumption during pelletization. Results demonstrated that variation in biomass composition significantly influences pellet quality, with lignin content improving durability and ash content affecting moisture uptake and combustion properties. Cucumber had the highest pellet density (691.2 kg/m 3 ) and durability (97.9%), making it suitable for long-term storage and transport. Sawdust exhibited the lowest moisture absorption (16–18% db), which is attributed to its highest lignin content. Pelletization energy requirements varied significantly, with cucumber (21.8 kWh/t) and summer squash (18.7 kWh/t) requiring the lowest energy input, whereas soybean (49.6 kWh/t) and sawdust (47.3 kWh/t) exhibited the highest energy demands due to greater resistance to densification. A predictive model was developed to correlate single pellet density and durability with bulk pellet properties—yielding high predictive accuracy, with R 2 = 0.936 for bulk density ( B D e ) and R 2 = 0.861 for bulk durability ( B D u )—thereby facilitating process optimization for large-scale pellet production. This study demonstrated that foliage residues from greenhouse crops, such as cucumber and summer squash, can be effectively pelletized with low energy input and high physical integrity. These outcomes suggest that such underutilized agricultural residues hold promise as a densified intermediate feedstock, supporting future applications in bioenergy systems and advancing circular resource use in controlled-environment agriculture.
Suggested Citation
Omid Gholami Banadkoki & Shahab Sokhansanj & Anthony Lau, 2025.
"Analysis of the Pelletability of Vegetable Crop Foliage Using a Commercial Flat Die Pellet Mill,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-24, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2284-:d:1646128
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2284-:d:1646128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.