IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i21p5756-d1784476.html

Techno-Economic Assessment of Net Metering and Energy Sharing in a Mixed-Use Renewable Energy Community in Montreal: A Simulation-Based Approach Using Tool4Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Athena Karami Fardian

    (Department of Buildings, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montréal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada)

  • Saeed Ranjbar

    (Department of Buildings, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montréal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada)

  • Luca Cimmino

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy)

  • Francesca Vecchi

    (Department of Architecture, Construction and Design, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy)

  • Caroline Hachem-Vermette

    (Department of Buildings, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montréal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada)

  • Ursula Eicker

    (Department of Buildings, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montréal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada)

  • Francesco Calise

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

The study presents a scalable decision-support framework to assess energy-sharing strategies within mixed-use urban districts, with a focus on planning, sustainability, and policy relevance. Two renewable energy-sharing mechanisms—energy sharing (ES) and net metering (NM)—are compared through a techno-economic analysis applied to a real neighborhood in Montréal, Canada. The workflow integrates irradiance-aware PV simulation, archetype-based urban building modeling, and financial sensitivity analysis adaptable to local regulatory conditions. Key performance indicators (KPIs)—including Self-Consumption Ratio ( SCR ), Self-Sufficiency Ratio ( SSR ), and peak load reduction—are used to evaluate technical performance. Results show that ES outperforms NM, achieving higher SCR (77% vs. 66%) and SSR (40% vs. 35%), and seasonal analysis reveals that peak shaving reaches 30.3% during summer afternoons, while PV impact is limited to 15.6% in winter mornings and negligible during winter evenings. Although both mechanisms are currently unprofitable under existing Québec tariffs, scenario analysis reveals that a 50% CAPEX subsidy or a 0.12 CAD/kWh feed-in tariff could make the system viable. The novelty of this study lies in the development of a replicable, archetype-driven, and policy-oriented simulation framework that enables the evaluation of renewable energy communities in mixed-use and data-scarce urban environments, contributing new insights into the Canadian energy transition context.

Suggested Citation

  • Athena Karami Fardian & Saeed Ranjbar & Luca Cimmino & Francesca Vecchi & Caroline Hachem-Vermette & Ursula Eicker & Francesco Calise, 2025. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Net Metering and Energy Sharing in a Mixed-Use Renewable Energy Community in Montreal: A Simulation-Based Approach Using Tool4Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-33, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:21:p:5756-:d:1784476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/21/5756/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/21/5756/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:21:p:5756-:d:1784476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.