Author
Listed:
- Wei Tang
(State Grid Anhui Electric Power Research Institute, Hefei 230601, China)
- Yue Zhang
(NARI Group Corporation Co., Ltd., (State Grid Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd.), Nanjing 211106, China
Beijing Kedong Electric Power Control System Co., Ltd., Beijing 100192, China)
- Xun Mao
(State Grid Anhui Electric Power Research Institute, Hefei 230601, China)
- Hetong Jia
(NARI Group Corporation Co., Ltd., (State Grid Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd.), Nanjing 211106, China
Beijing Kedong Electric Power Control System Co., Ltd., Beijing 100192, China)
- Kai Lv
(State Grid Anhui Electric Power Research Institute, Hefei 230601, China)
- Lianfei Shan
(NARI Group Corporation Co., Ltd., (State Grid Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd.), Nanjing 211106, China
Beijing Kedong Electric Power Control System Co., Ltd., Beijing 100192, China)
- Yongtian Qiao
(NARI Group Corporation Co., Ltd., (State Grid Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd.), Nanjing 211106, China
Beijing Kedong Electric Power Control System Co., Ltd., Beijing 100192, China)
- Tao Jiang
(NARI Group Corporation Co., Ltd., (State Grid Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd.), Nanjing 211106, China
Beijing Kedong Electric Power Control System Co., Ltd., Beijing 100192, China)
Abstract
To address the lack of effective risk-identification methods during the commissioning of new power grid equipment, we propose a knowledge graph construction approach for both scheme generation and risk identification. First, a gated attention mechanism fuses textual semantics with knowledge embeddings to enhance feature representation. Then, by introducing a global memory matrix with a decay-factor update mechanism, long-range dependencies across paragraphs are captured, yielding a domain-knowledge-augmentation universal information-extraction framework (DKA-UIE). Using the DKA-UIE, we learn high-dimensional mappings of commissioning-scheme entities and their labels, linking them according to equipment topology and risk-identification logic to build a commissioning knowledge graph for new equipment. Finally, we present an application that utilizes this knowledge graph for the automated generation of commissioning plans and risk identification. Experimental results show that our model achieves an average precision of 99.19%, recall of 99.47%, and an F 1 -score of 99.33%, outperforming existing methods. The resulting knowledge graph effectively supports both commissioning-plan generation and risk identification for new grid equipment.
Suggested Citation
Wei Tang & Yue Zhang & Xun Mao & Hetong Jia & Kai Lv & Lianfei Shan & Yongtian Qiao & Tao Jiang, 2025.
"Construction and Application of Knowledge Graph for Power Grid New Equipment Start-Up,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-14, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:20:p:5471-:d:1773458
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:20:p:5471-:d:1773458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.