IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i20p5352-d1768809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of Electricity Sales Forecasting Models Based on Different Feature Decomposition Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Shichong Chen

    (State Grid Information & Telecommunication Center (Big Data Center), Beijing 100033, China)

  • Yushu Zhang

    (State Grid Information & Telecommunication Center (Big Data Center), Beijing 100033, China)

  • Xiaoteng Ma

    (State Grid Information & Telecommunication Center (Big Data Center), Beijing 100033, China)

  • Xu Yang

    (Data Asset Management Research Center, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China)

  • Junyi Shi

    (Data Asset Management Research Center, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
    School of Statistics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Haoyang Ji

    (Data Asset Management Research Center, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
    School of Economics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

Abstract

Accurate forecasting of electricity sales holds significant practical importance. On the one hand, it helps to implement and achieve the annual goals of power companies, and on the other hand, it helps to control the balance of enterprise profits. This study was conducted in China using data from the State Grid Corporation (Henan, Fujian, and national data) from the Wind database. Based on collected data such as electricity sales, this study addresses the limitations of the existing literature, which mostly employs a single feature decomposition method for forecasting. We simultaneously apply three decomposition techniques—seasonal adjustment decomposition (X13), empirical mode decomposition (EMD), and discrete wavelet transform (DWT)—to decompose electricity sales into multiple components. Subsequently, we model each component using the ADL, SARIMAX, and LSTM models, synthesize the component-level forecasts, and realize the comparison of electricity sales forecasting models based on different feature decomposition methods. The findings reveal (1) forecasting performance based on feature decomposition generally outperforms direct forecasting without decomposition; (2) different regions may benefit from different decomposition methods—EMD is more suitable for regions with high sales volatility, while DWT is preferable for more stable regions; and (3) among the forecasting models, ADL performs better than SARIMAX, while LSTM yields the least accurate results when combined with decomposition methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Shichong Chen & Yushu Zhang & Xiaoteng Ma & Xu Yang & Junyi Shi & Haoyang Ji, 2025. "A Comparative Study of Electricity Sales Forecasting Models Based on Different Feature Decomposition Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:20:p:5352-:d:1768809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/20/5352/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/20/5352/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:20:p:5352-:d:1768809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.