IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i20p5338-d1768180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Game Theory-Based Bi-Level Capacity Allocation Strategy for Multi-Agent Combined Power Generation Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiding Chen

    (College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
    Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Operation and Control of Cascaded Hydropower Station, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

  • Yang Huang

    (College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

  • Yi Dong

    (Guohua (Hubei) New Energy Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430077, China)

  • Ziyue Ni

    (College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

Abstract

The wind–solar–storage–thermal combined power generation system is one of the key measures for China’s energy structure transition, and rational capacity planning of each generation entity within the system is of critical importance. First, this paper addresses the uncertainty of wind and photovoltaic (PV) power outputs through scenario-based analysis. Considering the diversity of generation entities and their complex interest demands, a bi-level capacity optimization framework based on game theory is proposed. In the upper-level framework, a game-theoretic method is designed to analyze the multi-agent decision-making process, and the objective function of capacity allocation for multiple entities is established. In the lower-level framework, multi-objective optimization is performed on utility functions and node voltage deviations. The Nash equilibrium of the non-cooperative game and the Shapley value of the cooperative game are solved to study the differences in the capacity allocation, economic benefits, and power supply stability of the combined power generation system under different game modes. The case study results indicate that under the cooperative game mode, when the four generation entities form a coalition, the overall system achieves the highest supply stability, the lowest carbon emissions at 30,195.29 tons, and the highest renewable energy consumption rate at 53.93%. Moreover, both overall and individual economic and environmental performance are superior to those under the non-cooperative game mode. By investigating the capacity configuration and joint operation strategies of the combined generation system, this study effectively enhances the enthusiasm of each generation entity to participate in the energy market; reduces carbon emissions; and promotes the development of a more efficient, environmentally friendly, and economical power generation model.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiding Chen & Yang Huang & Yi Dong & Ziyue Ni, 2025. "Game Theory-Based Bi-Level Capacity Allocation Strategy for Multi-Agent Combined Power Generation Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-29, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:20:p:5338-:d:1768180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/20/5338/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/20/5338/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:20:p:5338-:d:1768180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.