IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i20p5338-d1768180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Game Theory-Based Bi-Level Capacity Allocation Strategy for Multi-Agent Combined Power Generation Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiding Chen

    (College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
    Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Operation and Control of Cascaded Hydropower Station, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

  • Yang Huang

    (College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

  • Yi Dong

    (Guohua (Hubei) New Energy Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430077, China)

  • Ziyue Ni

    (College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

Abstract

The wind–solar–storage–thermal combined power generation system is one of the key measures for China’s energy structure transition, and rational capacity planning of each generation entity within the system is of critical importance. First, this paper addresses the uncertainty of wind and photovoltaic (PV) power outputs through scenario-based analysis. Considering the diversity of generation entities and their complex interest demands, a bi-level capacity optimization framework based on game theory is proposed. In the upper-level framework, a game-theoretic method is designed to analyze the multi-agent decision-making process, and the objective function of capacity allocation for multiple entities is established. In the lower-level framework, multi-objective optimization is performed on utility functions and node voltage deviations. The Nash equilibrium of the non-cooperative game and the Shapley value of the cooperative game are solved to study the differences in the capacity allocation, economic benefits, and power supply stability of the combined power generation system under different game modes. The case study results indicate that under the cooperative game mode, when the four generation entities form a coalition, the overall system achieves the highest supply stability, the lowest carbon emissions at 30,195.29 tons, and the highest renewable energy consumption rate at 53.93%. Moreover, both overall and individual economic and environmental performance are superior to those under the non-cooperative game mode. By investigating the capacity configuration and joint operation strategies of the combined generation system, this study effectively enhances the enthusiasm of each generation entity to participate in the energy market; reduces carbon emissions; and promotes the development of a more efficient, environmentally friendly, and economical power generation model.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiding Chen & Yang Huang & Yi Dong & Ziyue Ni, 2025. "Game Theory-Based Bi-Level Capacity Allocation Strategy for Multi-Agent Combined Power Generation Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-29, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:20:p:5338-:d:1768180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/20/5338/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/20/5338/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Javed, Muhammad Shahzad & Ma, Tao & Jurasz, Jakub & Amin, Muhammad Yasir, 2020. "Solar and wind power generation systems with pumped hydro storage: Review and future perspectives," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 176-192.
    2. Zenginis, Ioannis & Vardakas, John S. & Echave, Cynthia & Morató, Moisés & Abadal, Jordi & Verikoukis, Christos V., 2017. "Cooperation in microgrids through power exchange: An optimal sizing and operation approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 972-981.
    3. Wang, Haiyang & Zhang, Chenghui & Li, Ke & Ma, Xin, 2021. "Game theory-based multi-agent capacity optimization for integrated energy systems with compressed air energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    4. Fangfang Zheng & Xiaofang Meng & Lidi Wang & Nannan Zhang, 2023. "Operation Optimization Method of Distribution Network with Wind Turbine and Photovoltaic Considering Clustering and Energy Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Jicheng Liu & Dandan He, 2018. "Profit Allocation of Hybrid Power System Planning in Energy Internet: A Cooperative Game Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Kim, Minsoo & Park, Taeseop & Jeong, Jaeik & Kim, Hongseok, 2023. "Stochastic optimization of home energy management system using clustered quantile scenario reduction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    7. Chen, Zili & Wu, Zhaoyuan & Wei, Lanyi & Yang, Linyan & Yuan, Bo & Zhou, Ming, 2025. "Understanding the synergy of energy storage and renewables in decarbonization via random forest-based explainable AI," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 390(C).
    8. Xu, Bin & Zhu, Feilin & Zhong, Ping-an & Chen, Juan & Liu, Weifeng & Ma, Yufei & Guo, Le & Deng, Xiaoliang, 2019. "Identifying long-term effects of using hydropower to complement wind power uncertainty through stochastic programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lechtenberg, Fabian & Aresté-Saló, Lluc & Espuña, Antonio & Graells, Moisès, 2025. "Cooperative multi-actor multi-criteria optimization framework for process integration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PC).
    2. Wang, Haiyang & Li, Ke & Zhang, Chenghui & Chen, Jianfei, 2024. "Capacity and operation joint optimization for integrated energy system based on Nash bargaining game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    3. Chaoyang Chen & Hualing Liu & Yong Xiao & Fagen Zhu & Li Ding & Fuwen Yang, 2022. "Power Generation Scheduling for a Hydro-Wind-Solar Hybrid System: A Systematic Survey and Prospect," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-31, November.
    4. Makhdoomi, Sina & Askarzadeh, Alireza, 2020. "Daily performance optimization of a grid-connected hybrid system composed of photovoltaic and pumped hydro storage (PV/PHS)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 272-285.
    5. Zhao, Liang & Rong, Jiyun & Ma, Guofu & Liang, Chen & Long, Jian, 2025. "Multi-stage stochastic programming for integrated optimization of ethylene production processes and utility systems under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    6. Othman, Mohd Edzham Fareez & Sidek, Lariyah Mohd & Basri, Hidayah & El-Shafie, Ahmed & Ahmed, Ali Najah, 2025. "Climate challenges for sustainable hydropower development and operational resilience: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    7. Jiyong Li & Zeyi Hua & Lin Tian & Peiwen Chen & Hao Dong, 2024. "Optimal Capacity Allocation for Life Cycle Multiobjective Integrated Energy Systems Considering Capacity Tariffs and Eco-Indicator 99," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Toufani, Parinaz & Nadar, Emre & Kocaman, Ayse Selin, 2022. "Short-term assessment of pumped hydro energy storage configurations: Up, down, or closed?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 1086-1095.
    9. Su, Chengguo & Li, Li & Zhang, Taiheng & Sui, Quan & Yang, Yunbo, 2025. "A real-time scheduling framework of cascade hydropower-photovoltaic power complementary systems based on model predictive control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 392(C).
    10. Simshauser, P. & Gilmore, J., 2025. "Policy Sequencing: On the Electrification of Gas Loads in Australia’s National Electricity Market," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2528, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    11. Wang, Jin & Zhao, Zhipeng & Zhou, Jinglin & Cheng, Chuntian & Su, Huaying, 2024. "Developing operating rules for a hydro–wind–solar hybrid system considering peak-shaving demands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    12. Iwona Bąk & Anna Spoz & Magdalena Zioło & Marek Dylewski, 2021. "Dynamic Analysis of the Similarity of Objects in Research on the Use of Renewable Energy Resources in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
    13. Yu Huang & Weiting Zhang & Kai Yang & Weizhen Hou & Yiran Huang, 2019. "An Optimal Scheduling Method for Multi-Energy Hub Systems Using Game Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Jin, Xiaoyu & Liu, Benxi & Liao, Shengli & Cheng, Chuntian & Zhang, Yi & Zhao, Zhipeng & Lu, Jia, 2022. "Wasserstein metric-based two-stage distributionally robust optimization model for optimal daily peak shaving dispatch of cascade hydroplants under renewable energy uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    15. Kheshti, Mostafa & Zhao, Xiaowei & Liang, Ting & Nie, Binjian & Ding, Yulong & Greaves, Deborah, 2022. "Liquid air energy storage for ancillary services in an integrated hybrid renewable system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 298-307.
    16. Kun Wang & Lefeng Cheng & Meng Yin & Kuozhen Zhang & Ruikun Wang & Mengya Zhang & Runbao Sun, 2025. "Evolutionary Game Theory in Energy Storage Systems: A Systematic Review of Collaborative Decision-Making, Operational Strategies, and Coordination Mechanisms for Renewable Energy Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-153, August.
    17. Cheng, Qian & Liu, Pan & Ming, Bo & Yang, Zhikai & Cheng, Lei & Liu, Zheyuan & Huang, Kangdi & Xu, Weifeng & Gong, Lanqiang, 2024. "Synchronizing short-, mid-, and long-term operations of hydro-wind-photovoltaic complementary systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    18. Ding, Yihong & Tan, Qinliang & Shan, Zijing & Han, Jian & Zhang, Yimei, 2023. "A two-stage dispatching optimization strategy for hybrid renewable energy system with low-carbon and sustainability in ancillary service market," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 647-659.
    19. Yang, Yuqi & Zhou, Jianzhong & Liu, Guangbiao & Mo, Li & Wang, Yongqiang & Jia, Benjun & He, Feifei, 2020. "Multi-plan formulation of hydropower generation considering uncertainty of wind power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    20. Riepin, Iegor & Möbius, Thomas & Müsgens, Felix, 2021. "Modelling uncertainty in coupled electricity and gas systems—Is it worth the effort?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:20:p:5338-:d:1768180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.