IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i20p5329-d1767741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Hybrid Renewable Power Plants: A Comparative Analysis of Wind–Solar Configurations for Northeast Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Isabella Branco Renolphi

    (Institute of Energy and Environment (IEE), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo 05508-900, Brazil)

  • Walquiria N. Silva

    (Institute of Energy and Environment (IEE), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo 05508-900, Brazil)

  • Luís Felipe Normandia Lourenço

    (Institute of Energy and Environment (IEE), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo 05508-900, Brazil)

  • Bruno Z. D. Malta

    (Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

  • Thiago S. Andrade

    (Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

  • Giovani G. T. Vieira

    (Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

Abstract

The transition to sustainable electricity grids, particularly in countries with high renewable potential, such as Brazil, requires integrated assessments of hybrid and single-source configurations. This study analyzed the technical and economic feasibility of hybrid plants and isolated wind and solar systems in the Brazilian Northeast, focusing on Macaíba (RN) and Casa Nova (BA), regions characterized by high resource availability. The work addresses a gap in the literature by integrating detailed technical modeling and financial analysis of hybrid configurations, considering both local and operational constraints. Hourly simulations were performed using the HyDesign software (v1.1.0), with optimization based on the ratio between net present value (NPV) and invested capital (CAPEX), covering seven different scenarios by location, including hybrid combinations and systems with solar trackers. The results indicated that systems with solar tracking achieved superior economic performance. In Macaíba, the optimal configuration was the hybrid scenario with trackers, which increased the NPV/CAPEX by 27.69% compared to the relevant baseline. In Casa Nova, the best solution was the pure solar plant with trackers, which increased the NPV/CAPEX by 50.0% compared to fixed solar. Hybridization showed moderate gains in scenarios without tracking. It is concluded that while solar trackers are highly beneficial, the optimal plant configuration (pure solar or hybrid) is site-specific and depends on the local renewable resource profile. Notably, battery storage was not economically justified under the evaluated cost assumptions. The study contributes to the planning of renewable projects in contexts of high source complementarity.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabella Branco Renolphi & Walquiria N. Silva & Luís Felipe Normandia Lourenço & Bruno Z. D. Malta & Thiago S. Andrade & Giovani G. T. Vieira, 2025. "Optimizing Hybrid Renewable Power Plants: A Comparative Analysis of Wind–Solar Configurations for Northeast Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-25, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:20:p:5329-:d:1767741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/20/5329/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/20/5329/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:20:p:5329-:d:1767741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.