Author
Listed:
- Welson Bassi
(High Voltage Laboratory, Institute of Energy and Environment (IEE), University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)
Abstract
Power transformers are fundamental components in electrical grids, requiring robust insulation to operate reliably under various abnormal conditions, including overvoltages caused by lightning or switching. As defined by existing standards, the Basic Insulation Level (BIL) or Switching Insulation Level (SIL) of a transformer validates its reliability through impulse testing. These tests presume linearity in the overall system and equipment being tested. They compare waveforms at reduced and full impulse levels to detect or enhance insulation failures. Traditionally, this relies on visual inspection due to subjective acceptance criteria. This article presents a historical background review of the practices involving the use of analogue instruments evolved into digital oscilloscopes and digitizers, and the ways in which they enhance waveform acquisition and analysis capabilities. Despite advances in digital processing, including analyses on the frequency domain rather than only on time, such as transfer function analysis and coherence functions, and other signal transformations, such as wavelet calculation, interpreting differences in waveform records remains subjective. This article presents the development of a tool designed to emulate traditional photographic methods for waveform comparison. Moreover, the TRIMP software used enables multiple comparisons using various similarity and dissimilarity metrics in both the time and frequency domains, providing a robust system for identifying significant differences. The developed methodology and implemented metrics can form the basis for future machine learning or artificial intelligence (AI) applications. While digital tools offer significant advantages in impulse testing, improve reliability, reduce subjectivity, and provide robust decision-making metrics, their test approval remains based on visual comparisons due to consolidated engineering practices. Regardless of the metrics or indications obtained, the developed tool is a powerful graphic visualizer.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:156-:d:1559031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.