IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i19p5211-d1762015.html

Influence of Surface Complexity and Atmospheric Stability on Wind Shear and Turbulence in a Peri-Urban Wind Energy Site

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Zhang

    (National Wind Institute, Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA)

  • Elliott Walker

    (Department of Mathematics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA)

  • Corey D. Markfort

    (IIHR-Hydroscience and Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
    Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA)

Abstract

The large-scale deployment of wind energy underscores the critical need for accurate resource characterization to reduce uncertainty in power estimates and to enable the installation of wind farms in increasingly complex terrains. Accurate wind resource assessment in peri-urban and moderately complex terrains remains a significant challenge due to spatial heterogeneity in surface terrain features and atmospheric thermal stability. This study investigates the influence of surface complexity and atmospheric stratification on vertical wind profiles at a utility-scale wind turbine site in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. One year of multi-level wind data from a 106-meter-tall meteorological tower were analyzed to quantify variations in the wind shear exponent α , wind direction veer, and horizontal turbulence intensity (TI) across open-field and complex-surface wind sectors and four thermal stability classes, defined by the bulk Richardson number R i b . The results show that the wind shear exponent α increases systematically with atmospheric stability. Over the open-field terrain, α ranges from 0.11 in unstable conditions to 0.45 in strongly stable conditions, compared to 0.17 and 0.40 over the complex surface. A pronounced diurnal variation in α was observed, particularly during the summer months. Wind veer was greatest and exceeded 30° under strongly stable conditions over open terrain. Elevated TI values peaked at 32 m in height due to flow separation and wake turbulence from nearby vegetation and sloping terrain. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating terrain-induced and thermally driven variability into wind resource assessments to improve power prediction and turbine siting in complex heterogeneous terrain environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Zhang & Elliott Walker & Corey D. Markfort, 2025. "Influence of Surface Complexity and Atmospheric Stability on Wind Shear and Turbulence in a Peri-Urban Wind Energy Site," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5211-:d:1762015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5211/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5211/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohsen Vahidzadeh & Corey D. Markfort, 2020. "An Induction Curve Model for Prediction of Power Output of Wind Turbines in Complex Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Saint-Drenan, Yves-Marie & Besseau, Romain & Jansen, Malte & Staffell, Iain & Troccoli, Alberto & Dubus, Laurent & Schmidt, Johannes & Gruber, Katharina & Simões, Sofia G. & Heier, Siegfried, 2020. "A parametric model for wind turbine power curves incorporating environmental conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 754-768.
    3. Gualtieri, Giovanni, 2016. "Atmospheric stability varying wind shear coefficients to improve wind resource extrapolation: A temporal analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 376-390.
    4. Jennifer F. Newman & Petra M. Klein, 2014. "The Impacts of Atmospheric Stability on the Accuracy of Wind Speed Extrapolation Methods," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Gualtieri, Giovanni, 2015. "Surface turbulence intensity as a predictor of extrapolated wind resource to the turbine hub height," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 68-81.
    6. Rehman, Shafiqur & Al-Abbadi, Naif M., 2008. "Wind shear coefficient, turbulence intensity and wind power potential assessment for Dhulom, Saudi Arabia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(12), pages 2653-2660.
    7. Mohsen Vahidzadeh & Corey D. Markfort, 2019. "Modified Power Curves for Prediction of Power Output of Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Gualtieri, Giovanni, 2019. "A comprehensive review on wind resource extrapolation models applied in wind energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 215-233.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pérez Albornoz, C. & Escalante Soberanis, M.A. & Ramírez Rivera, V. & Rivero, M., 2022. "Review of atmospheric stability estimations for wind power applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. He, J.Y. & Chan, P.W. & Li, Q.S. & Lee, C.W., 2022. "Characterizing coastal wind energy resources based on sodar and microwave radiometer observations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Christy Pérez & Michel Rivero & Mauricio Escalante & Victor Ramirez & Damien Guilbert, 2023. "Influence of Atmospheric Stability on Wind Turbine Energy Production: A Case Study of the Coastal Region of Yucatan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Li, Jiale & Wang, Xuefei & Yu, Xiong (Bill), 2018. "Use of spatio-temporal calibrated wind shear model to improve accuracy of wind resource assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 469-485.
    5. Crippa, Paola & Alifa, Mariana & Bolster, Diogo & Genton, Marc G. & Castruccio, Stefano, 2021. "A temporal model for vertical extrapolation of wind speed and wind energy assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    6. Gualtieri, Giovanni, 2019. "A comprehensive review on wind resource extrapolation models applied in wind energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 215-233.
    7. Asadi, Meysam & Pourhossein, Kazem, 2021. "Wind farm site selection considering turbulence intensity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    8. Russell McKenna & Stefan Pfenninger & Heidi Heinrichs & Johannes Schmidt & Iain Staffell & Katharina Gruber & Andrea N. Hahmann & Malte Jansen & Michael Klingler & Natascha Landwehr & Xiaoli Guo Lars', 2021. "Reviewing methods and assumptions for high-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy potential assessments," Papers 2103.09781, arXiv.org.
    9. McKenna, Russell & Pfenninger, Stefan & Heinrichs, Heidi & Schmidt, Johannes & Staffell, Iain & Bauer, Christian & Gruber, Katharina & Hahmann, Andrea N. & Jansen, Malte & Klingler, Michael & Landwehr, 2022. "High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments: A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 659-684.
    10. Gualtieri, Giovanni, 2018. "Surface turbulence intensity as a predictor of extrapolated wind resource to the turbine hub height: method's test at a mountain site," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 457-467.
    11. Yang, Xinrong & Jiang, Xin & Liang, Shijing & Qin, Yingzuo & Ye, Fan & Ye, Bin & Xu, Jiayu & He, Xinyue & Wu, Jie & Dong, Tianyun & Cai, Xitian & Xu, Rongrong & Zeng, Zhenzhong, 2024. "Spatiotemporal variation of power law exponent on the use of wind energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    12. Gualtieri, Giovanni & Secci, Sauro, 2014. "Extrapolating wind speed time series vs. Weibull distribution to assess wind resource to the turbine hub height: A case study on coastal location in Southern Italy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 164-176.
    13. Mehrjoo, Mehrdad & Jafari Jozani, Mohammad & Pawlak, Miroslaw, 2021. "Toward hybrid approaches for wind turbine power curve modeling with balanced loss functions and local weighting schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    14. Bahamonde, Manuel Ignacio & Litrán, Salvador P., 2019. "Study of the energy production of a wind turbine in the open sea considering the continuous variations of the atmospheric stability and the sea surface roughness," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 163-175.
    15. He, J.Y. & Chan, P.W. & Li, Q.S. & Huang, Tao & Yim, Steve Hung Lam, 2024. "Assessment of urban wind energy resource in Hong Kong based on multi-instrument observations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    16. Giani, Paolo & Tagle, Felipe & Genton, Marc G. & Castruccio, Stefano & Crippa, Paola, 2020. "Closing the gap between wind energy targets and implementation for emerging countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    17. Gualtieri, Giovanni, 2016. "Atmospheric stability varying wind shear coefficients to improve wind resource extrapolation: A temporal analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 376-390.
    18. Nedaei, Mojtaba & Assareh, Ehsanolah & Walsh, Philip R., 2018. "A comprehensive evaluation of the wind resource characteristics to investigate the short term penetration of regional wind power based on different probability statistical methods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 362-374.
    19. Ippolito, Matteo & De Caro, Dario & Cannarozzo, Marcella & Provenzano, Giuseppe & Ciraolo, Giuseppe, 2024. "Evaluation of daily crop reference evapotranspiration and sensitivity analysis of FAO Penman-Monteith equation using ERA5-Land reanalysis database in Sicily, Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    20. Tuy, Soklin & Lee, Han Soo & Chreng, Karodine, 2022. "Integrated assessment of offshore wind power potential using Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) downscaling with Sentinel-1 satellite imagery, optimal sites, annual energy production and equivalent CO2 reduction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5211-:d:1762015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.