Author
Listed:
- Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak
(Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland)
- Elżbieta Radziszewska-Zielina
(Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland)
- Mirosław Dechnik
(Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland)
- Aleksandra Buda-Chowaniec
(Faculty of Civil Engineering, CUT Doctoral School, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland)
- Beata Sadowska
(Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska Street 45E, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)
- Michał Ciuła
(Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland)
- Tomasz Kapecki
(Faculty of Architecture, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland)
Abstract
The building sector plays a key role in the transition toward climate neutrality, with national regulations across the EU requiring the construction of nearly zero-energy buildings (nZEBs). However, while energy performance has been extensively studied, less attention has been given to the problem of ensuring user comfort—both indoors and in the surrounding outdoor areas—under nZEB design constraints. This gap raises two key research objectives: (1) to evaluate whether a well-designed nZEB with extensive glazing maintains acceptable indoor thermal comfort and (2) to assess whether residents experience greater outdoor thermal comfort and satisfaction in small, sun-exposed private gardens or in larger, shaded communal green spaces. To address these objectives, a newly built residential estate near Kraków (Poland) was analyzed. The investigation included simulation-based assessments during the design phase and in situ measurements during building operation, complemented by a user survey on spatial preferences. Indoor comfort was evaluated for rooms with large glazed façades, as well as rooms with standard-sized windows, while outdoor comfort was assessed in both private gardens and a shared green courtyard. Results show that shading the southwest-oriented glazed façade with an overhanging terrace provided slightly lower temperatures in ground-floor rooms compared to rooms with standard unshaded windows. Outdoors, users experienced lower thermal comfort in small, unshaded gardens than in the larger, vegetated communal area (pocket park), which demonstrated greater capacity for temperature moderation and thermal stress reduction. Survey responses further indicate that potential future residents prefer the inclusion of a shared green–blue infrastructure area, even at the expense of building some housing units in semi-detached form, instead of maximizing the number of detached units with unshaded individual gardens. These findings emphasize the importance of addressing both indoor and outdoor comfort in residential nZEB design, showing that technological efficiency must be complemented by user-centered design strategies. This integrated approach can improve the well-being of residents while supporting climate change adaptation in the built environment.
Suggested Citation
Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak & Elżbieta Radziszewska-Zielina & Mirosław Dechnik & Aleksandra Buda-Chowaniec & Beata Sadowska & Michał Ciuła & Tomasz Kapecki, 2025.
"User Comfort Evaluation in a Nearly Zero-Energy Housing Complex in Poland: Indoor and Outdoor Analysis,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-24, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5209-:d:1761982
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5209-:d:1761982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.