IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i19p5209-d1761982.html

User Comfort Evaluation in a Nearly Zero-Energy Housing Complex in Poland: Indoor and Outdoor Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland)

  • Elżbieta Radziszewska-Zielina

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland)

  • Mirosław Dechnik

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Buda-Chowaniec

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, CUT Doctoral School, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland)

  • Beata Sadowska

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska Street 45E, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Michał Ciuła

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland)

  • Tomasz Kapecki

    (Faculty of Architecture, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland)

Abstract

The building sector plays a key role in the transition toward climate neutrality, with national regulations across the EU requiring the construction of nearly zero-energy buildings (nZEBs). However, while energy performance has been extensively studied, less attention has been given to the problem of ensuring user comfort—both indoors and in the surrounding outdoor areas—under nZEB design constraints. This gap raises two key research objectives: (1) to evaluate whether a well-designed nZEB with extensive glazing maintains acceptable indoor thermal comfort and (2) to assess whether residents experience greater outdoor thermal comfort and satisfaction in small, sun-exposed private gardens or in larger, shaded communal green spaces. To address these objectives, a newly built residential estate near Kraków (Poland) was analyzed. The investigation included simulation-based assessments during the design phase and in situ measurements during building operation, complemented by a user survey on spatial preferences. Indoor comfort was evaluated for rooms with large glazed façades, as well as rooms with standard-sized windows, while outdoor comfort was assessed in both private gardens and a shared green courtyard. Results show that shading the southwest-oriented glazed façade with an overhanging terrace provided slightly lower temperatures in ground-floor rooms compared to rooms with standard unshaded windows. Outdoors, users experienced lower thermal comfort in small, unshaded gardens than in the larger, vegetated communal area (pocket park), which demonstrated greater capacity for temperature moderation and thermal stress reduction. Survey responses further indicate that potential future residents prefer the inclusion of a shared green–blue infrastructure area, even at the expense of building some housing units in semi-detached form, instead of maximizing the number of detached units with unshaded individual gardens. These findings emphasize the importance of addressing both indoor and outdoor comfort in residential nZEB design, showing that technological efficiency must be complemented by user-centered design strategies. This integrated approach can improve the well-being of residents while supporting climate change adaptation in the built environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak & Elżbieta Radziszewska-Zielina & Mirosław Dechnik & Aleksandra Buda-Chowaniec & Beata Sadowska & Michał Ciuła & Tomasz Kapecki, 2025. "User Comfort Evaluation in a Nearly Zero-Energy Housing Complex in Poland: Indoor and Outdoor Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5209-:d:1761982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5209/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5209/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magdalena Szczepańska & Anna Gałecka-Drozda & Agnieszka Wilkaniec, 2023. "Green Space at New Housing Estates: Flat Price Versus Accessibility to Good Quality Greenery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Cláudia Reis & António Lopes, 2019. "Evaluating the Cooling Potential of Urban Green Spaces to Tackle Urban Climate Change in Lisbon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Szymon Firląg & Abdullah Sikander Baig & Dariusz Koc, 2025. "Historical Analysis of Real Energy Consumption and Indoor Conditions in Single-Family Passive Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-35, January.
    4. Elżbieta Jadwiga Szymańska & Maria Kubacka & Joanna Woźniak & Jan Polaszczyk, 2022. "Analysis of Residential Buildings in Poland for Potential Energy Renovation toward Zero-Emission Construction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-24, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eduardo Medeiros & Bernardo Valente & Ricardo Pinto & Miguel Sales Dias, 2023. "Using the Impact-WEB_GIS Platform to Assess the Impacts of Environmental Sustainability Public Policies in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Anne-Katrin Schneider & Michael W. Strohbach & Mario App & Boris Schröder, 2019. "The ‘GartenApp’: Assessing and Communicating the Ecological Potential of Private Gardens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Chunyu Chen & Linglan Bi & Kuanfan Zhu, 2021. "Study on Spatial-Temporal Change of Urban Green Space in Yangtze River Economic Belt and Its Driving Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Marek Borowski & Charith Madhuwantha Rathnayake & Klaudia Zwolińska-Glądys, 2025. "Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings (NZEBs): A Systematic Review of the Current Status of Single-Family Houses in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Mara Ottoboni & Salvatore Eugenio Pappalardo & Massimo De Marchi & Fabrizio Ungaro, 2023. "Characterization and Mapping of Public and Private Green Areas in the Municipality of Forlì (NE Italy) Using High-Resolution Images," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Bijoya Saha & Shah Md Atiqul Haq, 2024. "Perception of urban green space among university students in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Miguel Amado & Evelina Rodrigues & Francesca Poggi & Manuel Duarte Pinheiro & António Ribeiro Amado & Helder José, 2020. "Using Different Levels of Information in Planning Green Infrastructure in Luanda, Angola," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-26, April.
    8. Troy Malatesta & Gregory M. Morrison & Jessica K. Breadsell & Christine Eon, 2023. "A Systematic Literature Review of the Interplay between Renewable Energy Systems and Occupant Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, June.
    9. Peng Ren & Xinxin Zhang & Haoyan Liang & Qinglin Meng, 2019. "Assessing the Impact of Land Cover Changes on Surface Urban Heat Islands with High-Spatial-Resolution Imagery on a Local Scale: Workflow and Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, September.
    10. Andrea De Montis & Antonio Ledda & Vittorio Serra & Alessandro Manunta & Giovanna Calia, 2025. "Urban Green Spaces and Climate Changes: Assessing Ecosystem Services for the Municipality of Sassari (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Ken Tamminga & João Cortesão & Michiel Bakx, 2020. "Convivial Greenstreets: A Concept for Climate-Responsive Urban Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Zuzana Vinczeová & Attila Tóth, 2025. "Urban Green Spaces and Collective Housing: Spatial Patterns and Ecosystem Services for Sustainable Residential Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Maria Vitória Ribeiro Gomes & Aline Pires Veról, 2024. "Assessing Public Perceptions of Blue–Green Infrastructure in Urban Watersheds: A Case Study of Acari River, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-32, November.
    14. Shantanu Ashok Raut & Lia Marchi & Jacopo Gaspari, 2025. "A System Thinking Approach to Circular-Based Strategies for Deep Energy Renovation: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-27, May.
    15. Sylvia Gonzalez-Gorman & Sung-Wook Kwon & Dennis Patterson, 2019. "Municipal Efforts to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Evidence from U.S. Cities on the U.S.-Mexico Border," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Li, Baitong & Li, Jian & Huang, Shihua, 2025. "Influencing factors of low-carbon renovation of public buildings from the perspective of stakeholders," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    17. Zhanqiang Zhu & Wei Lang & Xiaofang Tao & Jiali Feng & Kai Liu, 2019. "Exploring the Quality of Urban Green Spaces Based on Urban Neighborhood Green Index—A Case Study of Guangzhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Jingming Qian & Shujiang Miao & Nigel Tapper & Jianguang Xie & Greg Ingleton, 2020. "Investigation on Airport Landscape Cooling Associated with Irrigation: A Case Study of Adelaide Airport, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, October.
    19. K. Viktoria Stein & Thomas E. Dorner, 2024. "From Health-in-All-Policies to Climate-in-All-Policies: Using the Synergies between Health Promotion and Climate Protection to Take Action," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-13, January.
    20. Henriqueta Teixeira & Maria da Glória Gomes & António Moret Rodrigues & Júlia Pereira, 2021. "In-Service Thermal and Luminous Performance Monitoring of a Refurbished Building with Solar Control Films on the Glazing System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5209-:d:1761982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.