IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i19p5116-d1758562.html

MPC Design and Comparative Analysis of Single-Phase 7-Level PUC and 9-Level CSC Inverters for Grid Integration of PV Panels

Author

Listed:
  • Raghda Hariri

    (Faculty of Engineering and Architecture—ESIB, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Dekwaneh, Beirut 1104 2020, Lebanon)

  • Fadia Sebaaly

    (Hydro-Québec Research Institute (IREQ), Varennes, QC J3X 1S1, Canada)

  • Kamal Al-Haddad

    (Ecole de Technologie Supérieure, Université du Québec, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada)

  • Hadi Y. Kanaan

    (Faculty of Engineering and Architecture—ESIB, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Dekwaneh, Beirut 1104 2020, Lebanon
    Ecole de Technologie Supérieure, Université du Québec, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada)

Abstract

In this study, a novel comparison between single phase 7-Level Packed U—Cell (PUC) inverter and single phase 9-Level Cross Switches Cell (CSC) inverter with Model Predictive Controller (MPC) for solar grid-tied applications is presented. Our innovation introduces a unique approach by integrating PV solar panels in PUC and CSC inverters in their two DC links rather than just one which increases power density of the system. Another key benefit for the proposed models lies in their simplified design, offering improved power quality and reduced complexity relative to traditional configurations. Moreover, both models feature streamlined control architectures that eliminate the need for additional controllers such as PI controllers for grid reference current extraction. Furthermore, the implementation of Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) technology directly optimizes power output from the PV panels, negating the necessity for a DC-DC booster converter during integration. To validate the proposed concept’s performance for both inverters, extensive simulations were conducted using MATLAB/Simulink, assessing both inverters under steady-state conditions as well as various disturbances to evaluate its robustness and dynamic response. Both inverters exhibit robustness against variations in grid voltage, phase shift, and irradiation. By comparing both inverters, results demonstrate that the CSC inverter exhibits superior performance due to its booster feature which relies on generating voltage level greater than the DC input source. This primary advantage makes CSC a booster inverter.

Suggested Citation

  • Raghda Hariri & Fadia Sebaaly & Kamal Al-Haddad & Hadi Y. Kanaan, 2025. "MPC Design and Comparative Analysis of Single-Phase 7-Level PUC and 9-Level CSC Inverters for Grid Integration of PV Panels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5116-:d:1758562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Memon, Mudasir Ahmed & Mekhilef, Saad & Mubin, Marizan & Aamir, Muhammad, 2018. "Selective harmonic elimination in inverters using bio-inspired intelligent algorithms for renewable energy conversion applications: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2235-2253.
    2. Mostefa Mohamed-Seghir & Abdelbasset Krama & Shady S. Refaat & Mohamed Trabelsi & Haitham Abu-Rub, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence-Based Weighting Factor Autotuning for Model Predictive Control of Grid-Tied Packed U-Cell Inverter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ankita Choudhary & Ashutosh Kumar Singh & Rajib Kumar Mandal & Akshay Kumar Saha, 2024. "Switched Capacitor Inverter with Reduced Inrush Current and High Boosting Gain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Andrzej Łebkowski & Wojciech Koznowski, 2020. "Analysis of the Use of Electric and Hybrid Drives on SWATH Ships," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Reguieg, Zakaria & Bouyakoub, Ismail & Mehedi, Fayçal, 2025. "Harmonic mitigation in grid-integrated renewable energy systems with nonlinear loads," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    4. Akhter, Muhammad Naveed & Mekhilef, Saad & Mokhlis, Hazlie & Ali, Raza & Usama, Muhammad & Muhammad, Munir Azam & Khairuddin, Anis Salwa Mohd, 2022. "A hybrid deep learning method for an hour ahead power output forecasting of three different photovoltaic systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    5. Gowthamraj Rajendran & Reiko Raute & Cedric Caruana, 2025. "A Comprehensive Review of Solar PV Integration with Smart-Grids: Challenges, Standards, and Grid Codes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-80, April.
    6. Muhyaddin Rawa & Marif Daula Siddique & Saad Mekhilef & Noraisyah Mohamed Shah & Hussain Bassi & Mehdi Seyedmahmoudian & Ben Horan & Alex Stojcevski, 2019. "Design and Implementation of a Hybrid Single T-Type Double H-Bridge Multilevel Inverter (STDH-MLI) Topology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Piotr Szewczyk & Andrzej Łebkowski, 2021. "Studies on Energy Consumption of Electric Light Commercial Vehicle Powered by In-Wheel Drive Modules," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-28, November.
    8. Sanaz Sabzevari & Rasool Heydari & Maryam Mohiti & Mehdi Savaghebi & Jose Rodriguez, 2021. "Model-Free Neural Network-Based Predictive Control for Robust Operation of Power Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, April.
    9. Yunlei Zhang & Cungang Hu & Qunjing Wang & Yufei Zhou & Yue Sun, 2019. "Neutral-Point Potential Balancing Control Strategy for Three-Level ANPC Converter Using SHEPWM Scheme," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Jie Wu & Lizhong Bie & Nan Jin & Leilei Guo & Jitao Zhang & Jiagui Tao & Václav Snášel, 2020. "Dual-Frequency Output of Wireless Power Transfer System with Single Inverter Using Improved Differential Evolution Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Md. Tariqul Islam & Hady H. Fayek & Eugen Rusu & Md. Fayzur Rahman, 2021. "A Novel Hexagonal-Shaped Multilevel Inverter with Reduced Switches for Grid-Integrated Photovoltaic System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Mojtaba Nedaei & Maurizio Faccio & Philip R Walsh & Mohammad G Rasul & Stéphane Pierre Alain Bordas, 2024. "Novel design, implementation, and performance optimization of inverters by considering the effect of modulation," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(7), pages 3703-3735, November.
    13. Faris E. Alfaris & Essam A. Al-Ammar & Ghazi A. Ghazi & Ahmed A. Al-Katheri, 2024. "Design Enhancement of Grid-Connected Residential PV Systems to Meet the Saudi Electricity Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-29, June.
    14. Ibrahim Harbi & Mohamed Abdelrahem & Mostafa Ahmed & Ralph Kennel, 2020. "Reduced-Complexity Model Predictive Control with Online Parameter Assessment for a Grid-Connected Single-Phase Multilevel Inverter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, September.
    15. Yin, Linfei & Gao, Qi & Zhao, Lulin & Wang, Tao, 2020. "Expandable deep learning for real-time economic generation dispatch and control of three-state energies based future smart grids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    16. Yandi G. Landera & Oscar C. Zevallos & Rafael C. Neto & Jose F. da Costa Castro & Francisco A. S. Neves, 2023. "A Review of Grid Connection Requirements for Photovoltaic Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5116-:d:1758562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.