Author
Listed:
- Raghda Hariri
(Faculty of Engineering and Architecture—ESIB, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Dekwaneh, Beirut 1104 2020, Lebanon)
- Fadia Sebaaly
(Hydro-Québec Research Institute (IREQ), Varennes, QC J3X 1S1, Canada)
- Kamal Al-Haddad
(Ecole de Technologie Supérieure, Université du Québec, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada)
- Hadi Y. Kanaan
(Faculty of Engineering and Architecture—ESIB, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Dekwaneh, Beirut 1104 2020, Lebanon
Ecole de Technologie Supérieure, Université du Québec, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada)
Abstract
In this study, a novel comparison between single phase 7-Level Packed U—Cell (PUC) inverter and single phase 9-Level Cross Switches Cell (CSC) inverter with Model Predictive Controller (MPC) for solar grid-tied applications is presented. Our innovation introduces a unique approach by integrating PV solar panels in PUC and CSC inverters in their two DC links rather than just one which increases power density of the system. Another key benefit for the proposed models lies in their simplified design, offering improved power quality and reduced complexity relative to traditional configurations. Moreover, both models feature streamlined control architectures that eliminate the need for additional controllers such as PI controllers for grid reference current extraction. Furthermore, the implementation of Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) technology directly optimizes power output from the PV panels, negating the necessity for a DC-DC booster converter during integration. To validate the proposed concept’s performance for both inverters, extensive simulations were conducted using MATLAB/Simulink, assessing both inverters under steady-state conditions as well as various disturbances to evaluate its robustness and dynamic response. Both inverters exhibit robustness against variations in grid voltage, phase shift, and irradiation. By comparing both inverters, results demonstrate that the CSC inverter exhibits superior performance due to its booster feature which relies on generating voltage level greater than the DC input source. This primary advantage makes CSC a booster inverter.
Suggested Citation
Raghda Hariri & Fadia Sebaaly & Kamal Al-Haddad & Hadi Y. Kanaan, 2025.
"MPC Design and Comparative Analysis of Single-Phase 7-Level PUC and 9-Level CSC Inverters for Grid Integration of PV Panels,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-26, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5116-:d:1758562
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5116-:d:1758562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.