A Comparative Analysis of Hydrogen Fuel Cells and Internal Combustion Engines Used for Service Operation Vessels Propulsion

In response to the IMO’s decarbonisation strategy, hydrogen—especially green hydrogen—becomes a promising alternative fuel in shipping. This article provides a comparative analysis of two hydrogen propulsion technologies suitable for a service vessel (SOV) operating in offshore wind farms: hydrogen fuel cells and hydrogen-powered internal combustion engines. This study focuses on the use of liquid hydrogen (LH 2 ) stored in cryogenic tanks and fuel cells as an alternative to the previously considered solution based on compressed hydrogen (CH 2 ) stored in high-pressure cylinders (700 bar) and internal combustion engines. The research aims to examine the feasibility of a fully hydrogen-powered SOV energy system. The analyses showed that the use of liquefied hydrogen in SOVs leads to the threefold reduction in tank volume (1001 m 3 LH 2 vs. 3198 m 3 CH 2 ) and the weight of the storage system (243 t vs. 647 t). Despite this, neither of the technologies provides the expected 2-week autonomy of SOVs. LH 2 storage allows for a maximum of 10 days of operation, which is still an improvement over the CH 2 gas variant (3 days). The main reason for this is that hydrogen tanks can only be located on the open deck. Although hydrogen fuel cells take up on average 13.7% more space than internal combustion engines, they are lower (by an average of 24.3%) and weigh less (by an average of 50.6%), and their modular design facilitates optimal arrangement in the engine room. In addition, the elimination of the exhaust system and lubrication simplifies the engine room layout, reducing its weight and space requirements. Most importantly, however, the use of fuel cells eliminates exhaust gas emissions into the atmosphere.