IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i19p5099-d1758049.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk-Based Analysis of Safeguards for Ammonia Tank Trucks Used in Bunkering

Author

Listed:
  • Young-Do Jo

    (MS Gas Co., Ltd., 92, Gaya-daero 176 Beon-gil, Busan 47021, Republic of Korea)

  • Chung Min Jun

    (MS Gas Co., Ltd., 92, Gaya-daero 176 Beon-gil, Busan 47021, Republic of Korea)

  • Jin-Jun Kim

    (MS Gas Co., Ltd., 92, Gaya-daero 176 Beon-gil, Busan 47021, Republic of Korea)

  • Hae-yeon Lee

    (Division of Marine System Engineering, National Korea Maritime & Ocean University, 727 Taejong-ro, Busan 47021, Republic of Korea)

  • Kang Woo Chun

    (Division of Marine System Engineering, National Korea Maritime & Ocean University, 727 Taejong-ro, Busan 47021, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Ammonia bunkering is becoming increasingly important in the maritime industry as ammonia is recognized as a viable alternative fuel for reducing carbon emissions in shipping. Bunkering by tank truck plays a crucial role in the early stages of ammonia-fueled ship development. It involves the efficient transportation of ammonia from production facilities to bunkering stations, offering flexibility in refueling vessels at ports, including those lacking extensive infrastructures like pipelines or large storage tanks. However, the safety and regulations surrounding ammonia use in bunkering are paramount to its adoption. This study focuses on analyzing the effectiveness of safeguards designed to reduce the frequency of ammonia releases and mitigate potential leak damage during bunkering operations. We examine how safeguards, such as breakaway couplings and dry disconnect couplings (DDC), can reduce leak occurrences, while excess flow valves (EFVs) and automatic emergency shut-off valves (ESVs) can limit the consequences of such incidents. If the breakaway coupling and DDC are implemented as safeguards in the flexible hose, and maintenance is performed in accordance with ANSI/CGA G-2.1, the probability of hose failure per bunkering operation will be reduced from approximately 10 −5 to 10 −7 . Under the worst weather conditions during the day, the probit value (Pr) depends on both the amount of ammonia released and the distance from the release point, with the distance having a greater effect on fatality than the amount of ammonia. The individual risk is analyzed to determine whether the bunkering process using tank trucks is acceptable. The analysis concludes that, with these safeguards in place, the individual risk at a location 20 m from the bunker site can be reduced to the lower limit of the As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) zone, ensuring a safe and acceptable level of risk for ammonia bunkering operations. The safety integrity level (SIL) of the automatic ESV should be at least 2 or higher, and it should be activated within a few seconds after a gas leak begins.

Suggested Citation

  • Young-Do Jo & Chung Min Jun & Jin-Jun Kim & Hae-yeon Lee & Kang Woo Chun, 2025. "Risk-Based Analysis of Safeguards for Ammonia Tank Trucks Used in Bunkering," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5099-:d:1758049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5099/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5099/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5099-:d:1758049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.