IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i19p5099-d1758049.html

Risk-Based Analysis of Safeguards for Ammonia Tank Trucks Used in Bunkering

Author

Listed:
  • Young-Do Jo

    (MS Gas Co., Ltd., 92, Gaya-daero 176 Beon-gil, Busan 47021, Republic of Korea)

  • Chung Min Jun

    (MS Gas Co., Ltd., 92, Gaya-daero 176 Beon-gil, Busan 47021, Republic of Korea)

  • Jin-Jun Kim

    (MS Gas Co., Ltd., 92, Gaya-daero 176 Beon-gil, Busan 47021, Republic of Korea)

  • Hae-yeon Lee

    (Division of Marine System Engineering, National Korea Maritime & Ocean University, 727 Taejong-ro, Busan 47021, Republic of Korea)

  • Kang Woo Chun

    (Division of Marine System Engineering, National Korea Maritime & Ocean University, 727 Taejong-ro, Busan 47021, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Ammonia bunkering is becoming increasingly important in the maritime industry as ammonia is recognized as a viable alternative fuel for reducing carbon emissions in shipping. Bunkering by tank truck plays a crucial role in the early stages of ammonia-fueled ship development. It involves the efficient transportation of ammonia from production facilities to bunkering stations, offering flexibility in refueling vessels at ports, including those lacking extensive infrastructures like pipelines or large storage tanks. However, the safety and regulations surrounding ammonia use in bunkering are paramount to its adoption. This study focuses on analyzing the effectiveness of safeguards designed to reduce the frequency of ammonia releases and mitigate potential leak damage during bunkering operations. We examine how safeguards, such as breakaway couplings and dry disconnect couplings (DDC), can reduce leak occurrences, while excess flow valves (EFVs) and automatic emergency shut-off valves (ESVs) can limit the consequences of such incidents. If the breakaway coupling and DDC are implemented as safeguards in the flexible hose, and maintenance is performed in accordance with ANSI/CGA G-2.1, the probability of hose failure per bunkering operation will be reduced from approximately 10 −5 to 10 −7 . Under the worst weather conditions during the day, the probit value (Pr) depends on both the amount of ammonia released and the distance from the release point, with the distance having a greater effect on fatality than the amount of ammonia. The individual risk is analyzed to determine whether the bunkering process using tank trucks is acceptable. The analysis concludes that, with these safeguards in place, the individual risk at a location 20 m from the bunker site can be reduced to the lower limit of the As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) zone, ensuring a safe and acceptable level of risk for ammonia bunkering operations. The safety integrity level (SIL) of the automatic ESV should be at least 2 or higher, and it should be activated within a few seconds after a gas leak begins.

Suggested Citation

  • Young-Do Jo & Chung Min Jun & Jin-Jun Kim & Hae-yeon Lee & Kang Woo Chun, 2025. "Risk-Based Analysis of Safeguards for Ammonia Tank Trucks Used in Bunkering," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5099-:d:1758049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5099/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5099/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricci, Federica & Yang, Ming & Reniers, Genserik & Cozzani, Valerio, 2024. "Emergency response in cascading scenarios triggered by natural events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    2. Steven K. Rose & Richard Richels & Geoffrey Blanford & Thomas Rutherford, 2017. "The Paris Agreement and next steps in limiting global warming," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 255-270, May.
    3. Misuri, Alessio & Ricci, Federica & Sorichetti, Riccardo & Cozzani, Valerio, 2023. "The Effect of Safety Barrier Degradation on the Severity of Primary Natech Scenarios," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    4. Phan Anh Duong & Bo Rim Ryu & Mi Kyoung Song & Hong Van Nguyen & Dong Nam & Hokeun Kang, 2023. "Safety Assessment of the Ammonia Bunkering Process in the Maritime Sector: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-30, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valente, Matteo & Ricci, Federica & Cozzani, Valerio, 2025. "A systematic review of Resilience Engineering applications to Natech accidents in the chemical and process industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    2. Subburaj, Sudha & S, Kalaiselvam, 2026. "NaTech-specific Inherent Safety Index (NISI): A quantitative framework for evaluating safety performance during extreme weather and geophysical hazards in hazardous industrial clusters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    3. Ma, Weikai & Wang, Yanfu & Xing, Peijie & Yang, Ming, 2025. "A Monte Carlo-based modeling method for the spatial-temporal evolution process of multi-hazard and higher-order domino effect," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    4. Tran Thi Nguyet Minh & Hanh-Thi Hong Hoang & Hyung Sik Nam & Anas S. Alamoush & Phan Anh Duong, 2025. "Revisiting Port Decarbonization for Advancing a Sustainable Maritime Industry: Insights from Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-36, May.
    5. Georgios Giakoumakis & Dimitrios Sidiras, 2025. "Production and Storage of Hydrogen from Biomass and Other Sources: Technologies and Policies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-41, January.
    6. Pan, Xunzhang & Chen, Wenying & Zhou, Sheng & Wang, Lining & Dai, Jiaquan & Zhang, Qi & Zheng, Xinzhu & Wang, Hailin, 2020. "Implications of near-term mitigation on China's long-term energy transitions for aligning with the Paris goals," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Moslem, Sarbast & Gholamizadeh, Kamran & Zarei, Esmaeil & Pasman, Hans J & Martinez-Pastor, Beatriz & Pilla, Francesco, 2025. "A comparative assessment of domino accident analysis methods in process industries using LMAW and DNMA techniques," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    8. Seyed Behbood Issa-Zadeh & Claudia Lizette Garay-Rondero, 2025. "Decarbonizing Seaport Maritime Traffic: Finding Hope," World, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Schneider, Moritz & Halekotte, Lukas & Comes, Tina & Lichte, Daniel & Fiedrich, Frank, 2025. "Emergency Response Inference Mapping (ERIMap): A Bayesian network-based method for dynamic observation processing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    10. Liu, Guanyi & Liu, Shifeng & Li, Xuewei & Li, Xueyan & Gong, Daqing, 2025. "Multiscenario deduction analysis for railway emergencies using knowledge metatheory and dynamic Bayesian networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    11. Jin, Kun & Wang, Wei & Zhao, De & Hua, Xuedong, 2026. "Mitigating cascading failures in urban rail transit networks through passenger flow guidance," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 681(C).
    12. Lilli, Giordano & Sanavia, Matteo & Oboe, Roberto & Vianello, Chiara & Manzolaro, Mattia & De Ruvo, Pasquale Luca & Andrighetto, Alberto, 2024. "A semi-quantitative risk assessment of remote handling operations on the SPES Front-End based on HAZOP-LOPA," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    13. Abrishami Shirazi, Nazanin & Omidvar, Babak & Nohegar, Ahmad, 2026. "A comprehensive resilience assessment framework and techniques for chemical process plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PA).
    14. Felix Ekardt & Jutta Wieding & Anika Zorn, 2018. "Paris Agreement, Precautionary Principle and Human Rights: Zero Emissions in Two Decades?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Clare Hanmer & Charlie Wilson & Oreane Y. Edelenbosch & Detlef P. van Vuuren, 2022. "Translating Global Integrated Assessment Model Output into Lifestyle Change Pathways at the Country and Household Level," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-31, February.
    16. Muhammad Faisal Shehzad & Mainak Dan & Valerio Mariani & Seshadhri Srinivasan & Davide Liuzza & Carmine Mongiello & Roberto Saraceno & Luigi Glielmo, 2021. "A Heuristic Algorithm for Combined Heat and Power System Operation Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Shah, Md Shaheen & Khan, Faisal & Zendehboudi, Sohrab & Mamudu, Abbas & Heagle, Dru, 2025. "A novel framework for dynamic risk analysis of CO2 sequestration in shallow aquifers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    18. Christoph Boehringer & Thomas Fox Rutherford, 2017. "Paris after Trump: An inconvenient insight," Working Papers V-400-17, University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics, revised Jun 2017.
    19. Yunfeng Yang & Guohua Chen & Yuanfei Zhao, 2023. "A Quantitative Framework for Propagation Paths of Natech Domino Effects in Chemical Industrial Parks: Part II—Risk Assessment and Mitigation System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    20. John E. T. Bistline & James Merrick & Victor Niemeyer, 2020. "Estimating Power Sector Leakage Risks and Provincial Impacts of Canadian Carbon Pricing," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(1), pages 91-118, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5099-:d:1758049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.