IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i19p5083-d1757314.html

Performance and Emission Characteristics of n-Pentanol–Diesel Blends in a Single-Cylinder CI Engine

Author

Listed:
  • Doohyun Kim

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan-Dearborn, 4901 Evergreen Road, Dearborn, MI 48128, USA)

  • Jeonghyeon Yang

    (Department of Mechanical System Engineering, Gyeongsang National University, 2 Tongyeonghaean-ro, Tongyeong 53064, Republic of Korea)

  • Jaesung Kwon

    (Department of Mechanical System Engineering, Gyeongsang National University, 2 Tongyeonghaean-ro, Tongyeong 53064, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This work provides a systematic evaluation of the performance and regulated emissions of binary n-pentanol–diesel blends under steady-state conditions, thereby clarifying condition-dependent efficiency–emission trade-offs across multiple loads and speeds. A single-cylinder, air-cooled diesel engine was operated at two speeds (1700 and 2700 rpm) and four brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) levels (0.25–0.49 MPa) using commercial diesel (D100) and three n-pentanol–diesel blends at volume ratios of 10%, 30%, and 50% (designated D90P10, D70P30, and D50P50, respectively). Brake thermal efficiency (BTE), brake specific energy consumption (BSEC), and brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) were measured alongside exhaust emissions of nitrogen oxides (NO x ), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbon (HC), carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), and smoke opacity. The results show that due to a lower cetane number, high latent heat of vaporization, and reduced heating value, n-pentanol blends incur efficiency and fuel consumption penalties at light to moderate loads. However, these disadvantages diminish or reverse at high loads and speeds: D50P50 surpasses D100 in BTE and matches or improves BSEC and BSFC at 2700 rpm and 0.49 MPa. Emission data reveal that the blend’s fuel-bound oxygen and enhanced mixing provide up to 16% NO x reduction; 35% and 45% reductions in CO and HC, respectively; and a 74% reduction in smoke opacity under demanding conditions, while CO 2 per unit work output aligns with or falls below D100 at high load. These findings demonstrate that optimized n-pentanol–diesel blends can simultaneously improve efficiency and mitigate emissions, offering a practical pathway for low-carbon diesel engines.

Suggested Citation

  • Doohyun Kim & Jeonghyeon Yang & Jaesung Kwon, 2025. "Performance and Emission Characteristics of n-Pentanol–Diesel Blends in a Single-Cylinder CI Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5083-:d:1757314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5083/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5083/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caliskan, Hakan & Mori, Kazutoshi, 2017. "Environmental, enviroeconomic and enhanced thermodynamic analyses of a diesel engine with diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) and diesel particulate filter (DPF) after treatment systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 128-144.
    2. Wei, Liangjie & Cheung, C.S. & Huang, Zuohua, 2014. "Effect of n-pentanol addition on the combustion, performance and emission characteristics of a direct-injection diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 172-180.
    3. Xiaoyu Liu & Jie Zhu & Zhongcheng Wang, 2025. "Study on Cold Start of Methanol Direct Injection Engine Based on Laser Ignition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-30, April.
    4. Song, Lu-Kai & Tao, Fei & Li, Xue-Qin & Yang, Le-Chang & Wei, Yu-Peng & Beer, Michael, 2025. "Physics-embedding multi-response regressor for time-variant system reliability assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    5. Wei, Lijiang & Yao, Chunde & Han, Guopeng & Pan, Wang, 2016. "Effects of methanol to diesel ratio and diesel injection timing on combustion, performance and emissions of a methanol port premixed diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 223-232.
    6. Atmanli, Alpaslan & Ileri, Erol & Yilmaz, Nadir, 2016. "Optimization of diesel–butanol–vegetable oil blend ratios based on engine operating parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 569-580.
    7. Pedrozo, Vinícius B. & May, Ian & Zhao, Hua, 2017. "Exploring the mid-load potential of ethanol-diesel dual-fuel combustion with and without EGR," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 263-275.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Solmaz, Hamit & Ardebili, Seyed Mohammad Safieddin & Calam, Alper & Yılmaz, Emre & İpci, Duygu, 2021. "Prediction of performance and exhaust emissions of a CI engine fueled with multi-wall carbon nanotube doped biodiesel-diesel blends using response surface method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    2. Kwonwoo Jang & Jeonghyeon Yang & Beomsoo Kim & Jaesung Kwon, 2024. "Effects of Decanol Blended Diesel Fuel on Engine Efficiency and Pollutant Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Ghadikolaei, Meisam Ahmadi & Wong, Pak Kin & Cheung, Chun Shun & Ning, Zhi & Yung, Ka-Fu & Zhao, Jing & Gali, Nirmal Kumar & Berenjestanaki, Alireza Valipour, 2021. "Impact of lower and higher alcohols on the physicochemical properties of particulate matter from diesel engines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Deviren, Halis, 2024. "Enhancing diesel engine efficiency and emission performance through oxygenated and non-oxygenated additives: A comparative study of alcohol and cycloalkane impacts on diesel-biodiesel blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    5. Wang, Bin & Yao, Anren & Yao, Chunde & Chen, Chao & Wang, Hui, 2020. "In-depth comparison between pure diesel and diesel methanol dual fuel combustion mode," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    6. Nadir Yilmaz & Alpaslan Atmanli & Matthew J. Hall & Francisco M. Vigil, 2022. "Determination of the Optimum Blend Ratio of Diesel, Waste Oil Derived Biodiesel and 1-Pentanol Using the Response Surface Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    7. M, Vinod Babu & K, Madhu Murthy & G, Amba Prasad Rao, 2017. "Butanol and pentanol: The promising biofuels for CI engines – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1068-1088.
    8. Rafael R. Maes & Geert Potters & Erik Fransen & Rowan Van Schaeren & Silvia Lenaerts, 2022. "Influence of Adding Low Concentration of Oxygenates in Mineral Diesel Oil and Biodiesel on the Concentration of NO, NO 2 and Particulate Matter in the Exhaust Gas of a One-Cylinder Diesel Generator," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Yesilyurt, Murat Kadir & Eryilmaz, Tanzer & Arslan, Mevlüt, 2018. "A comparative analysis of the engine performance, exhaust emissions and combustion behaviors of a compression ignition engine fuelled with biodiesel/diesel/1-butanol (C4 alcohol) and biodiesel/diesel/n-pentanol (C5 alcohol) fuel blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1332-1351.
    10. Song, Lu-Kai & Tao, Fei & Peng, Gong-Zhuang, 2026. "Mixed loss-guided modular regression for dependent system reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 267(PB).
    11. Manju Dhakad Tanwar & Felipe Andrade Torres & Ali Mubarak Alqahtani & Pankaj Kumar Tanwar & Yashas Bhand & Omid Doustdar, 2023. "Promising Bioalcohols for Low-Emission Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Han, Zhiqiang & Li, Bolun & Tian, Wei & Xia, Qi & Leng, Songpeng, 2019. "Influence of coupling action of oxygenated fuel and gas circuit oxygen on hydrocarbons formation in diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 196-206.
    13. Krishnamoorthi, M. & Malayalamurthi, R. & Sakthivel, R., 2019. "Optimization of compression ignition engine fueled with diesel - chaulmoogra oil - diethyl ether blend with engine parameters and exhaust gas recirculation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 579-602.
    14. Kaijie Liang & Jinguang Liang & Guowei Li & Zhengri Shao & Zhipeng Jiang & Jincheng Feng, 2024. "Improvement of Engine Combustion and Emission Characteristics by Fuel Property Modulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Hua, Yang & Xiang, Xingwei & Gao, Desong & Qiu, Liang & Zhang, Yiming, 2025. "Comparative study on soot morphology and nanostructure characteristics of higher alcohol fuels and parent n-alkanes in co-flow diffusion flames," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    16. Hamedi, Mohammad Reza & Doustdar, Omid & Tsolakis, Athanasios & Hartland, Jonathan, 2021. "Energy-efficient heating strategies of diesel oxidation catalyst for low emissions vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    17. Das, Amar Kumar & Sahu, Santosh Kumar & Panda, Achyut Kumar, 2022. "Current status and prospects of alternate liquid transportation fuels in compression ignition engines: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Wei Tian & Yunlu Chu & Zhiqiang Han & Xiang Wang & Wenbin Yu & Xueshun Wu, 2019. "Experimental Study of the Effect of Intake Oxygen Concentration on Engine Combustion Process and Hydrocarbon Emissions with N-Butanol-Diesel Blended Fuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Ibrahim Yildiz & Hakan Caliskan & Kazutoshi Mori, 2020. "Exergy analysis and nanoparticle assessment of cooking oil biodiesel and standard diesel fueled internal combustion engine," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(8), pages 1303-1317, December.
    20. Manish Kumar & Varun Kumar Singh & Abhishek Sharma & Naushad Ahmad Ansari & Raghvendra Gautam & Yashvir Singh, 2022. "Effect of fuel injection pressure and EGR techniques on various engine performance and emission characteristics on a CRDI diesel engine when run with linseed oil methyl ester," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(1), pages 41-63, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5083-:d:1757314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.