IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i19p5074-d1757077.html

Development of Low-Emission Cooking Device Based on Catalytic Hydrogen Combustion Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Alina E. Kozhukhova

    (Hydrogen South Africa (HySA) Infrastructure, Faculty of Engineering, North-West University (NWU), Potchefstroom Campus, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa)

  • Stephanus P. du Preez

    (Hydrogen South Africa (HySA) Infrastructure, Faculty of Engineering, North-West University (NWU), Potchefstroom Campus, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa)

  • Christiaan Martinson

    (Hydrogen South Africa (HySA) Infrastructure, Faculty of Engineering, North-West University (NWU), Potchefstroom Campus, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa)

  • Dmitri G. Bessarabov

    (Hydrogen South Africa (HySA) Infrastructure, Faculty of Engineering, North-West University (NWU), Potchefstroom Campus, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa)

Abstract

The development of a prototype of a cooking device based on catalytic hydrogen combustion (CHC) is presented in this research. CHC is the catalytic reaction between hydrogen (H 2 ) and oxygen (O 2 ), generating heat and water vapour as the only by-product. In the developed prototype, only H 2 gas is fed to the catalytic surface while air is entrained from the environment by convection (i.e., passive approach). Therefore, the convective mass transfer during the exothermic reaction between H 2 and O 2 allows a continuous H 2 /air mixture supply to the catalytic surface. In this prototype, 30 g of Pt/Al 2 O 3 (0.5 wt% Pt) catalyst is used for the H 2 combustion. The developed prototype performance was evaluated by determining its combustion temperature, H 2 slip (amount of unreacted H 2 in the flue gas), and flue gas composition with respect to NO x formation. Tests were performed at inlet H 2 flows of 1–5 normal (N) L/min, which equates to a power output of 0.18–0.90 kW, respectively. The observed combustion temperature of the catalyst surface, determined using an IR camera, was in the range of 324.5 °C (at 1 NL/min) to 611.2 °C (at 5 NL/min). The H 2 slip of <1.75 vol% was observed during CHC at 1–5 NL/min H 2 flow. The maximum efficiency of 42% was determined at 1 NL/min H 2 flow and a power output of 0.18 kW.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina E. Kozhukhova & Stephanus P. du Preez & Christiaan Martinson & Dmitri G. Bessarabov, 2025. "Development of Low-Emission Cooking Device Based on Catalytic Hydrogen Combustion Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5074-:d:1757077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5074/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5074/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khandelwal, Meena & Hill, Matthew E. & Greenough, Paul & Anthony, Jerry & Quill, Misha & Linderman, Marc & Udaykumar, H.S., 2017. "Why Have Improved Cook-Stove Initiatives in India Failed?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 13-27.
    2. Asim Kumar Sarker & Abul Kalam Azad & Mohammad G. Rasul & Arun Teja Doppalapudi, 2023. "Prospect of Green Hydrogen Generation from Hybrid Renewable Energy Sources: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Grzegorz Mordarski & Konrad Skowron & Dorota Duraczyńska & Anna Drabczyk & Robert P. Socha, 2025. "Development of a Multi-Bed Catalytic Heat Generator Utilizing a Palladium-Based Hydrogen Combustion System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Elías Hurtado Pérez & Oscar Mulumba Ilunga & David Alfonso Solar & María Cristina Moros Gómez & Paula Bastida-Molina, 2020. "Sustainable Cooking Based on a 3 kW Air-Forced Multifuel Gasification Stove Using Alternative Fuels Obtained from Agricultural Wastes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Patel, Sameer & Khandelwal, Anish & Leavey, Anna & Biswas, Pratim, 2016. "A model for cost-benefit analysis of cooking fuel alternatives from a rural Indian household perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 291-302.
    6. Yasmin, Nazia & Grundmann, Philipp, 2019. "Adoption and diffusion of renewable energy – The case of biogas as alternative fuel for cooking in Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 255-264.
    7. Alina E. Kozhukhova & Stephanus P. du Preez & Dmitri G. Bessarabov, 2021. "Catalytic Hydrogen Combustion for Domestic and Safety Applications: A Critical Review of Catalyst Materials and Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vania Vigolo & Rezarta Sallaku & Federico Testa, 2018. "Drivers and Barriers to Clean Cooking: A Systematic Literature Review from a Consumer Behavior Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Nazia Yasmin & Philipp Grundmann, 2019. "Pre- and Post-Adoption Beliefs about the Diffusion and Continuation of Biogas-Based Cooking Fuel Technology in Pakistan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    4. Jagadish, Arundhati & Dwivedi, Puneet & McEntire, Kira D. & Chandar, Mamta, 2019. "Agent-based modeling of “cleaner” cookstove adoption and woodfuel use: An integrative empirical approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Ni, Ji-Qin, 2024. "A review of household and industrial anaerobic digestion in Asia: Biogas development and safety incidents," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    6. Ahmed Moustapha Mfokeu & Elie Virgile Chrysostome & Jean-Pierre Gueyie & Olivier Ebenezer Mun Ngapna, 2023. "Consumer Motivation behind the Use of Ecological Charcoal in Cameroon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Avijit Saha & Md. Abdur Razzak & M. Rezwan Khan, 2021. "Electric Cooking Diary in Bangladesh: Energy Requirement, Cost of Cooking Fuel, Prospects, and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Carlos Cacciuttolo & Martin Navarrete & Edison Atencio, 2024. "Renewable Wind Energy Implementation in South America: A Comprehensive Review and Sustainable Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-45, July.
    9. Busiswe Skosana & Mukwanga W. Siti & Nsilulu T. Mbungu & Sonu Kumar & Willy Mulumba, 2023. "An Evaluation of Potential Strategies in Renewable Energy Systems and Their Importance for South Africa—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-27, November.
    10. Benjamin L. Robinson & Mike J. Clifford & Sarah Jewitt, 2021. "TIME to Change: An Evaluation of Practical Action Nepal’s Results Based Finance Program," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Jongseok Seo & Lidziya Lysiankova & Young-Seok Ock & Dongphil Chun, 2017. "Priorities of Coworking Space Operation Based on Comparison of the Hosts and Users’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-10, August.
    12. Hossain, Md. Sanowar & Masuk, Nahid Imtiaz & Das, Barun K. & Das, Arnob & Kibria, Md. Golam & Chowdhury, Miftahul Mobin & Shozib, Imtiaz Ahmed, 2023. "Theoretical estimation of energy potential and environmental emissions mitigation for major livestock manure in Bangladesh," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    13. Ghosh, Samarpita & Sarkhel, Prasenjit, 2025. "Clean fuel use, Political representation and Forest cover: Evidence from Rural India," EconStor Preprints 320716, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    14. Kumar, Amit & Karn, Ashish & McGregor, Craig & Singh, Varun Pratap, 2025. "A critical analysis of paradigm shifts from domestic solar cooking to institutional solar cooking technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    15. Juan Pous de la Flor & Juan Pous Cabello & María de la Cruz Castañeda & Marcelo Fabián Ortega & Pedro Mora, 2024. "New Uses for Coal Mines as Potential Power Generators and Storage Sites," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-16, May.
    16. Ahmad, Munir & Wu, Yiyun, 2022. "Household-based factors affecting uptake of biogas plants in Bangladesh: Implications for sustainable development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 858-867.
    17. Jabeen, Gul & Ahmad, Munir & Zhang, Qingyu, 2021. "Perceived critical factors affecting consumers’ intention to purchase renewable generation technologies: Rural-urban heterogeneity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    18. Naimul Haque & Abul Kalam Azad, 2023. "Comparative Study of Hydrogen Production from Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste and Its Challenges: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Oloore, Luqman E. & Adeoye, Abiodun E. & Alotaibi, Moteb & Alansi, Amani M. & Qasem, Naef A.A. & Qahtan, Talal F., 2026. "From theory to practice: Evolving methods and challenges in green hydrogen production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PB).
    20. Wang, Shangrui & Cao, Anran & Wang, Guohua & Xiao, Yiming, 2022. "The Impact of energy poverty on the digital divide: The mediating effect of depression and Internet perception," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5074-:d:1757077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.