IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i19p5067-d1756603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Lithofacies, Diagenesis, and Fracture Control on Reservoir Quality in Ultra-Deep Tight Sandstones: A Case from the Bashijiqike Formation, Kuqa Depression

Author

Listed:
  • Wendan Song

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
    College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Zhaohui Xu

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
    College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Huaimin Xu

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
    College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Lidong Wang

    (Dina Oil & Gas Production Management Area, PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla 841000, China)

  • Yanli Wang

    (Kela Oil & Gas Production Management Area, PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla 841000, China)

Abstract

Fractured tight sandstone reservoirs pose challenges for gas development due to low matrix porosity and permeability, complex pore structures, and pervasive fractures. This study focuses on the Bashijiqike Formation in the Keshen Gas Field, Kuqa Depression, aiming to clarify the geological controls on reservoir quality. Lithofacies, diagenetic facies, and fracture facies were systematically classified by core analyses, thin sections, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), cathodoluminescence (CL), X-ray diffraction (XRD), grain size analyses, mercury intrusion capillary pressure (MICP), well logs and resistivity imaging logging (FMI). Their impacts on porosity, permeability and gas productivity were quantitatively assessed. A ternary reservoir quality assessment model was established by coupling these three factors. Results show that five lithofacies, four diagenetic facies, and four fracture facies jointly control reservoir performance. The high-energy gravelly sandstone facies exhibit an average porosity of 6.0% and average permeability of 0.066 mD, while the fine-grained sandstone shows poor properties due to compaction and clay content. Unstable component dissolution facies enhance secondary porosity to 6.0% and permeability to 0.093 mD. Reticulate and conjugate fracture patterns correspond to gas production rates two to five times higher than those with single fractures. These findings support targeted reservoir classification and improved development strategies for ultra-deep tight gas reservoirs.

Suggested Citation

  • Wendan Song & Zhaohui Xu & Huaimin Xu & Lidong Wang & Yanli Wang, 2025. "Integrated Lithofacies, Diagenesis, and Fracture Control on Reservoir Quality in Ultra-Deep Tight Sandstones: A Case from the Bashijiqike Formation, Kuqa Depression," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-27, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5067-:d:1756603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5067/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5067/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5067-:d:1756603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.