IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i18p5021-d1754538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study on Carbon Emissions and Economics of Three Types of Slab Systems in the Materialization Stages

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Wang

    (School of Architectural Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China)

  • Ling Dong

    (School of Architecture, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China)

  • Hong Xian Li

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia)

Abstract

As one of the most important sources of carbon emissions, the construction industry consumes approximately 30% to 40% of global energy and emits about 30% of global greenhouse gases. Therefore, low-carbon emission reduction in the construction industry is an important means for China to achieve its “3060” strategic goals. In this context, prefabricated buildings have become a development direction for the transformation and upgrading of the construction industry due to their green, low-carbon, and efficient characteristics. Jiangsu Province in China has taken the lead in promoting the application of “three slabs”. Currently, the precast concrete floor slabs in the province mainly use two types: laminated slabs and prestressed hollow slabs. This article takes three types of slab systems (laminated slabs, prestressed hollow slabs, cast in-site slabs) as the research objects, compares and analyzes the construction process of the three in the materialization stage, establishes a calculation model for carbon emissions and comprehensive costs in the materialization stages, and conducts a comparative analysis of carbon emissions and economics from both environmental and economic perspectives. Research has shown that during the materialization stage, cast in-site slabs have the highest carbon emissions per unit area, with an increase of approximately 71.3% and 74.3% compared to laminated slabs and prestressed hollow slabs, respectively. The highest construction and installation cost per unit area is also for cast in-site slabs, which are increased by about 113.8% and 64.9%, respectively, compared to laminated slabs and prestressed hollow slabs. Among them, material costs are the most significant factor affecting construction and installation costs. The comprehensive cost per unit area of cast in-site slabs is much higher than that of laminated slabs and prestressed hollow slabs, with the construction and installation costs being the most important factors affecting the comprehensive cost. Therefore, compared with cast in-site slabs, laminated slabs and prestressed hollow slabs have significant advantages in carbon emissions and economics and thus have practical significance for carbon reduction in the construction industry and are worth promoting and further developing.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Wang & Ling Dong & Hong Xian Li, 2025. "Comparative Study on Carbon Emissions and Economics of Three Types of Slab Systems in the Materialization Stages," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-23, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:18:p:5021-:d:1754538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/18/5021/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/18/5021/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:18:p:5021-:d:1754538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.