IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i18p4976-d1753129.html

Real Options-Based Feasibility Evaluation of Offshore Wind Farm Development in Korea’s Idle Coastal Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Seoungbeom Na

    (Coast and River Spatial Information Research Lab., Department of Architectural, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Mokpo National University, Muan 58554, Jeonnam, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co–first authors.)

  • Jaebin Lee

    (Coast and River Spatial Information Research Lab., Department of Architectural, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Mokpo National University, Muan 58554, Jeonnam, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co–first authors.)

  • Woosik Jang

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study evaluates the economic feasibility of offshore wind farm development on idle coastal areas in Korea, focusing on the Wando Geumil Offshore Wind Farm (GOWF) as a representative case. Offshore wind farms are increasingly recognized as key contributors to achieving carbon neutrality, and Korea’s coastal idle zones offer strategic potential for large-scale deployment with minimal land-use conflict. To address market uncertainty—particularly the sensitivity of revenues to the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) and Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) weight—this research applies both the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method and Real Options Analysis (ROA), incorporating expansion and contraction scenarios. Using eleven years of historical System Marginal Price (SMP) and REC data, we estimate price volatility via a Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) model (σ = 23.04%). The DCF results indicate a negative Net Present Value (NPV) of −313.7 million USD, suggesting baseline infeasibility. In contrast, ROA adds strategic value, with the expansion option yielding 69.6 million USD and the contraction option 2.1 million USD in additional project value. These findings demonstrate that integrating policy-driven revenue uncertainty into ROA substantially alters investment recommendations, offering practical guidance for optimizing offshore wind farm deployment on Korea’s idle coastal sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Seoungbeom Na & Jaebin Lee & Woosik Jang, 2025. "Real Options-Based Feasibility Evaluation of Offshore Wind Farm Development in Korea’s Idle Coastal Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:18:p:4976-:d:1753129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/18/4976/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/18/4976/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alvaro Cartea & Marcelo Figueroa, 2005. "Pricing in Electricity Markets: A Mean Reverting Jump Diffusion Model with Seasonality," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 313-335.
    2. Daniela Borissova, 2024. "Decision-Making in Design, Maintenance, Planning, and Investment of Wind Energy," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-3-031-52219-2, December.
    3. Kitzing, Lena & Juul, Nina & Drud, Michael & Boomsma, Trine Krogh, 2017. "A real options approach to analyse wind energy investments under different support schemes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 83-96.
    4. Boomsma, Trine Krogh & Meade, Nigel & Fleten, Stein-Erik, 2012. "Renewable energy investments under different support schemes: A real options approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 225-237.
    5. Nadarajah, Selvaprabu & Secomandi, Nicola, 2023. "A review of the operations literature on real options in energy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 469-487.
    6. Chang-Gi Min & Jong Keun Park & Don Hur & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2015. "The Economic Viability of Renewable Portfolio Standard Support for Offshore Wind Farm Projects in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabianek, Paul & Glensk, Barbara & Madlener, Reinhard, 2024. "A sequential real options analysis for renewable power-to-hydrogen plants for Germany and California," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. Sun, Bo & Fan, Boyang & Zhang, Yifan & Xie, Jingdong, 2023. "Investment decisions and strategies of China's energy storage technology under policy uncertainty: A real options approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    3. Shao, Lingjie & Wu, Junle & Ma, Jinghan & Yu, Shengjie & Li, Mengsi, 2025. "Valuation and optimal operation of power investment projects with and without volume constraints under one-factor model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(C).
    4. Truong, Chi & Trueck, Stefan & Pitt, David & Best, Rohan, 2025. "Seasonality and valuation of renewable energy projects in a two factor model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 389(C).
    5. Kozlova, Mariia, 2017. "Real option valuation in renewable energy literature: Research focus, trends and design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 180-196.
    6. Hortay, Olivér & Rozner, Bence Péter, 2019. "Allocating renewable subsidies," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 236-247.
    7. Kazuya Ito & Makoto Tanaka & Ryuta Takashima, 2024. "Strategic investment in power generation and transmission under a feed-in premium scheme: a game theoretic real options analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 343(1), pages 349-372, December.
    8. Maoz, Yishay D. & Ruble, Richard, 2025. "Competitive equilibrium, investment runs, and renewable energy subsidies: A real options analysis," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    9. Yu-Fu Chen & Michael Funke, 2015. "Going Offshore: Investments in German Wind Energy under Uncertainty," CESifo Working Paper Series 5408, CESifo.
    10. Oliveira, Carlos & Perkowski, Nicolas, 2020. "Optimal investment decision under switching regimes of subsidy support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 120-132.
    11. Maeda, Mansaku & Watts, David, 2019. "The unnoticed impact of long-term cost information on wind farms’ economic value in the USA. – A real option analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 540-547.
    12. Aghajani, Daniel & Bratvold, Reidar B. & Hagspiel, Verena & Noshchenko, Olga & Toutain, Vincent K.G., 2025. "A multi-objective decision-making framework for the choice between mutually exclusive alternatives under uncertainty: Assessing the competitiveness of offshore wind for a gas field electrification on the NCS," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Su, Qing & Zhou, Peng & Ding, Hao, 2025. "Portfolio optimization of diversified energy transition investments with multiple risks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    14. Trivella, Alessio, 2025. "Optimizing electrolyzer investments for green hydrogen production under market and technology uncertainties," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    15. Finjord, Fredrik & Hagspiel, Verena & Lavrutich, Maria & Tangen, Marius, 2018. "The impact of Norwegian-Swedish green certificate scheme on investment behavior: A wind energy case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 373-389.
    16. Kim, Kyeongseok & Kim, Byungil & Kim, Hyoungkwan, 2018. "A decision-making model for the analysis of offshore wind farm projects under climate uncertainties: A case study of South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 853-860.
    17. Jia-Yue Huang & Yun-Fei Cao & Hui-Ling Zhou & Hong Cao & Bao-Jun Tang & Nan Wang, 2018. "Optimal Investment Timing and Scale Choice of Overseas Oil Projects: A Real Option Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, October.
    18. Reinhard Madlener & Barbara Glensk & Lukas Gläsel, 2019. "Optimal Timing of Onshore Wind Repowering in Germany under Policy Regime Changes: A Real Options Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-33, December.
    19. Szabó, Dávid Zoltán & Duck, Peter & Johnson, Paul, 2020. "Optimal trading of imbalance options for power systems using an energy storage device," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 3-22.
    20. Heidari, Mohammad Reza & Heravi, Gholamreza, 2024. "Development of flexible supportive policy with real options for renewable energy projects: Case of photovoltaic systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:18:p:4976-:d:1753129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.