Author
Listed:
- Mingyi Gao
(State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 100083, China
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China)
- Hua Liu
(State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 100083, China
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China)
- Yanyan Wang
(State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 100083, China
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China)
- Xiaohu Hu
(State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 100083, China
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China)
- Chuxi Liu
(Hildebrand Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)
- Wei Yu
(Hildebrand Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)
Abstract
The deep shale gas reservoirs of the southern Sichuan Basin exhibit high temperatures, high pressure, large stress differentials, and complex natural fracture systems. Since 2019, hydraulic fracturing technology in this region has evolved through four stages: exploratory fracturing, intensive limited-volume fracturing, tight spacing with controlled fluid and proppants, and balanced fracturing that combines long-section temporary plugging with short-section intensive cutting. Despite these advances, production remains suboptimal due to inefficient reserve utilization, a lack of quantitative methods for residual gas evaluation, and unclear identification of the remaining reserves. To address these challenges, we developed an integrated workflow combining dynamic production analysis, geomechanical modeling, and numerical simulation to evaluate representative fracturing techniques. Fracture propagation in the well group was modeled in the in-house hydraulic fracture simulator, ZFRAC, to assess fracture geometry, while production history and geological data were used to build calibrated reservoir simulation models. This enabled quantitative assessment of effective fracture parameters, reserve utilization, and residual gas distribution. The results show significant intra-stage heterogeneity driven by stress interference, effective fracture half-lengths of 60–105 m, and a cut-off ratio (proportion of effective fracture half-length to wetted fracture half-length) of 60–93%. Reserve utilization peaked at 60% for intensive limited-volume fracturing, while the efficacy of long-section temporary plugging was limited. These findings offer critical insights for optimizing infill strategies and enhancing sustainable shale gas development in southern Sichuan.
Suggested Citation
Mingyi Gao & Hua Liu & Yanyan Wang & Xiaohu Hu & Chuxi Liu & Wei Yu, 2025.
"Investigation into the Quantitative Assessment of Reserve Mobilization in Horizontal Well Groups Within the Southern Sichuan Shale Gas Reservoir,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-21, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:18:p:4910-:d:1750283
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:18:p:4910-:d:1750283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.