IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i18p4891-d1749615.html

Thermo-Hydraulic Comparison of Vertical and Horizontal Spiral Ground Heat Exchangers

Author

Listed:
  • Josue Quirino

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC), Mexicali 21280, Mexico)

  • Fernando Lara

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC), Mexicali 21280, Mexico)

  • Oscar López-Núñez

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC), Mexicali 21280, Mexico)

  • Jesús Cerezo

    (Centro de Investigación en Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos (UAEM), Cuernavaca 62209, Mexico)

  • Alexis Acuña

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC), Mexicali 21280, Mexico)

  • Adolfo Ruelas

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC), Mexicali 21280, Mexico)

  • Alvaro González-Angeles

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC), Mexicali 21280, Mexico)

  • Arilí Cárdenas-Robles

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC), Mexicali 21280, Mexico)

Abstract

Growing concerns about the energy crisis and global warming have driven interest in geothermal energy. This paper presents a numerical thermo-hydraulic comparison of spiral ground heat exchangers (SGHEs) in vertical and horizontal configurations. Numerical models were validated against experimental data using ANSYS Fluent 2023 R2. Five spiral pitch values were tested to analyze their impact on heat transfer rate (HTR), pressure drop, and total pipe length. Results showed that decreasing pitch increases HTR but significantly raises pressure drop and pipe length. Higher inlet fluid velocities also increased HTR but led to greater pressure drops. Under all tested conditions, the vertical configuration consistently outperformed the horizontal one, achieving up to 19.3% higher mean HTR. For both configurations, a 10 cm pitch provided the best balance between HTR, pressure drop, and pipe length. Increasing inlet velocity from 0.05 to 0.15 ms −1 increased mean HTR by approximately 30% for both configurations. These findings offer practical guidance for selecting the most appropriate SGHE configuration for specific geothermal applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Josue Quirino & Fernando Lara & Oscar López-Núñez & Jesús Cerezo & Alexis Acuña & Adolfo Ruelas & Alvaro González-Angeles & Arilí Cárdenas-Robles, 2025. "Thermo-Hydraulic Comparison of Vertical and Horizontal Spiral Ground Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:18:p:4891-:d:1749615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/18/4891/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/18/4891/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tong, Cang & Li, Xiangli & Ju, Hengjin & Duanmu, Lin & Huang, Caifeng, 2024. "A hybrid numerical model for horizontal ground heat exchanger," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    2. Jalaluddin, & Miyara, Akio & Tsubaki, Koutaro & Inoue, Shuntaro & Yoshida, Kentaro, 2011. "Experimental study of several types of ground heat exchanger using a steel pile foundation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 764-771.
    3. Florides, Georgios & Kalogirou, Soteris, 2007. "Ground heat exchangers—A review of systems, models and applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(15), pages 2461-2478.
    4. Yang, Weibo & Xu, Rui & Wang, Feng & Chen, Shikun, 2020. "Experimental and numerical investigations on the thermal performance of a horizontal spiral-coil ground heat exchanger," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 979-995.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javadi, Hossein & Mousavi Ajarostaghi, Seyed Soheil & Rosen, Marc A. & Pourfallah, Mohsen, 2019. "Performance of ground heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of recent advances," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 207-233.
    2. Cao, Ziming & Zhang, Guozhu & Liu, Yiping & Zhao, Xu & Li, Chenglin, 2022. "Influence of backfilling phase change material on thermal performance of precast high-strength concrete energy pile," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 374-390.
    3. Georgiadis, Konstantinos & Skordas, Dimitrios & Kamas, Ioannis & Comodromos, Emilios, 2020. "Heating and cooling induced stresses and displacements in heat exchanger piles in sand," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P2), pages 2599-2617.
    4. Selamat, Salsuwanda & Miyara, Akio & Kariya, Keishi, 2016. "Numerical study of horizontal ground heat exchangers for design optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 561-573.
    5. Faizal, Mohammed & Bouazza, Abdelmalek & Singh, Rao M., 2016. "Heat transfer enhancement of geothermal energy piles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 16-33.
    6. Hou, Gaoyang & Taherian, Hessam & Song, Ying & Jiang, Wei & Chen, Diyi, 2022. "A systematic review on optimal analysis of horizontal heat exchangers in ground source heat pump systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Michopoulos, A. & Zachariadis, T. & Kyriakis, N., 2013. "Operation characteristics and experience of a ground source heat pump system with a vertical ground heat exchanger," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 349-357.
    8. Rivera, Jaime A. & Blum, Philipp & Bayer, Peter, 2015. "Ground energy balance for borehole heat exchangers: Vertical fluxes, groundwater and storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1341-1351.
    9. Ma, Qijie & Wang, Peijun, 2020. "Underground solar energy storage via energy piles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    10. Kappler, Genyr & Dias, João Batista & Haeberle, Fernanda & Wander, Paulo Roberto & Moraes, Carlos Alberto Mendes & Modolo, Regina Célia Espinosa, 2019. "Study of an earth-to-water heat exchange system which relies on underground water tanks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1236-1246.
    11. Violante, Anna Carmela & Proposito, Marco & Donato, Filippo & Guidi, Giambattista & Falconi, Luca Maria, 2021. "Preliminary study of a closed loop vertical ground source heat pump system for an experimental pilot plant (Rome, Italy)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 415-422.
    12. Zhou, Yang & Wang, Jinyun & Li, Chong & Kong, Gangqiang & Li, Renrong, 2024. "Thermal interference process between two energy piles in 2D model using transparent soil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    13. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Insights into geothermal utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 44-60.
    14. Tang, F. & Lahoori, M. & Nowamooz, H. & Rosin-Paumier, S. & Masrouri, F., 2021. "A numerical study into effects of soil compaction and heat storage on thermal performance of a Horizontal Ground Heat Exchanger," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 740-752.
    15. M.F, Yozy Kepdib & R.M, Singh & C, Madiai & J.A, Facciorusso, 2025. "Heating and cooling geothermal systems in urban settings: The potential of energy micropiles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    16. Tang, Fujiao & Nowamooz, Hossein, 2018. "Long-term performance of a shallow borehole heat exchanger installed in a geothermal field of Alsace region," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 210-222.
    17. Gao, Jiajia & Li, Anbang & Xu, Xinhua & Gang, Wenjie & Yan, Tian, 2018. "Ground heat exchangers: Applications, technology integration and potentials for zero energy buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 337-349.
    18. Seokjae Lee & Sangwoo Park & Taek Hee Han & Jongmuk Won & Hangseok Choi, 2023. "Applicability Evaluation of Energy Slabs Installed in an Underground Parking Lot," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Trumpy, Eugenio & Bertani, Ruggero & Manzella, Adele & Sander, Marietta, 2015. "The web-oriented framework of the world geothermal production database: A business intelligence platform for wide data distribution and analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 379-389.
    20. Somogyi, Viola & Sebestyén, Viktor & Nagy, Georgina, 2017. "Scientific achievements and regulation of shallow geothermal systems in six European countries – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 934-952.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:18:p:4891-:d:1749615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.