IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i18p4857-d1748161.html

EU Bioenergy—Status and Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Manfred Kircher

    (KADIB—Kircher Advice in Bioeconomy, 60431 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

Abstract

In the interest of climate protection and the promotion of a sustainable economy, the European Union (EU) is pursuing a policy of transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable energies. The objective of this initiative is twofold: first, to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and second, to decrease the reliance on energy imports. This article utilizes publicly accessible databases and studies to assess the extent to which bioenergy (including fuels, heat, and electricity) contributes to these objectives and its long-term potential. Presently, bioenergy constitutes approximately 14% of Europe’s energy supply, with a share of 60% ranking as the foremost source of renewable energy. The evaluation of bioenergy-related GHG is hindered by the fact that the official databases do not satisfy the criteria necessary for scientific analysis. Further expansion of bioenergy should be based on European non-food biomass, as required by the current Renewable Energy Directive REDIII. Taking competing non-energy uses into account, the potential for further growth, contribution to total energy supply, and independence from imports is likely to be limited. As part of the strategic development of bioenergy, there is a considerable need for research into the use of biomass for competing energy and material use pathways, taking into account the different economic potential. To this end, the introduction of a new economic indicator of value creation intensity is proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Manfred Kircher, 2025. "EU Bioenergy—Status and Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:18:p:4857-:d:1748161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/18/4857/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/18/4857/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonas Zetterholm & Elina Bryngemark & Johan Ahlström & Patrik Söderholm & Simon Harvey & Elisabeth Wetterlund, 2020. "Economic Evaluation of Large-Scale Biorefinery Deployment: A Framework Integrating Dynamic Biomass Market and Techno-Economic Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Marek Wieruszewski & Katarzyna Mydlarz, 2022. "The Potential of the Bioenergy Market in the European Union—An Overview of Energy Biomass Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Mandley, S.J. & Daioglou, V. & Junginger, H.M. & van Vuuren, D.P. & Wicke, B., 2020. "EU bioenergy development to 2050," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    4. Chaudhary, Anu & Rathour, Ranju Kumari & Solanki, Preeti & Mehta Kakkar, Preeti & Pathania, Shruti & Walia, Abhishek & Baadhe, Rama Raju & Bhatia, Ravi Kant, 2025. "Recent technological advancements in biomass conversion to biofuels and bioenergy for circular economy roadmap," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Millinger, M. & Reichenberg, L. & Hedenus, F. & Berndes, G. & Zeyen, E. & Brown, T., 2022. "Are biofuel mandates cost-effective? - An analysis of transport fuels and biomass usage to achieve emissions targets in the European energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    2. Wu, Jy S. & Tseng, Hui-Kuan & Liu, Xiaoshuai, 2022. "Techno-economic assessment of bioenergy potential on marginal croplands in the U.S. southeast," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    3. Wu, Le & Yang, Yong & Yan, Ting & Wang, Yuqi & Zheng, Lan & Qian, Kun & Hong, Furong, 2020. "Sustainable design and optimization of co-processing of bio-oil and vacuum gas oil in an existing refinery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    4. Kasin Ransikarbum & Wattana Chanthakhot & Tony Glimm & Jettarat Janmontree, 2023. "Evaluation of Sourcing Decision for Hydrogen Supply Chain Using an Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Tool," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Chaudhary, Anu & Rathour, Ranju Kumari & Solanki, Preeti & Mehta Kakkar, Preeti & Pathania, Shruti & Walia, Abhishek & Baadhe, Rama Raju & Bhatia, Ravi Kant, 2025. "Recent technological advancements in biomass conversion to biofuels and bioenergy for circular economy roadmap," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    6. Liobikienė, Genovaitė & Miceikienė, Astrida, 2022. "The role of financial, social and informational mechanisms on willingness to use bioenergy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 21-27.
    7. Gayathri Priya Iragavarapu & Syed Shahed Imam & Omprakash Sarkar & Srinivasula Venkata Mohan & Young-Cheol Chang & Motakatla Venkateswar Reddy & Sang-Hyoun Kim & Naresh Kumar Amradi, 2023. "Bioprocessing of Waste for Renewable Chemicals and Fuels to Promote Bioeconomy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, May.
    8. Patel, Sanjay K.S. & Das, Devashish & Kim, Sun Chang & Cho, Byung-Kwan & Kalia, Vipin Chandra & Lee, Jung-Kul, 2021. "Integrating strategies for sustainable conversion of waste biomass into dark-fermentative hydrogen and value-added products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    9. Weiwei Wang, 2023. "Integrated Assessment of Economic Supply and Environmental Effects of Biomass Co-Firing in Coal Power Plants: A Case Study of Jiangsu, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Dan Yu & Caihong Zhang & Siyi Wang & Lan Zhang, 2023. "Evolutionary Game and Simulation Analysis of Power Plant and Government Behavior Strategies in the Coupled Power Generation Industry of Agricultural and Forestry Biomass and Coal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Omojola Awogbemi & Daramy Vandi Von Kallon & Emmanuel Idoko Onuh & Victor Sunday Aigbodion, 2021. "An Overview of the Classification, Production and Utilization of Biofuels for Internal Combustion Engine Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-43, September.
    12. Fischer, Robert & Toffolo, Andrea, 2022. "Is total system cost minimization fair to all the actors of an energy system? Not according to game theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    13. Legendre, Ugo & Delannoy, Louis & Brito-Parada, Pablo, 2026. "Physically consistent sectoral pathways for phasing out fossil fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    14. Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Rafał Wyszomierski & Piotr Bórawski & Paulina Trębska, 2025. "Economic Performance of the Producers of Biomass for Energy Generation in the Context of National and European Policies—A Case Study of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-29, July.
    15. Luana Bataglia & Antonio Conversano & Daniele Di Bona & Davide Sogni & Diego Voccia & Emanuele Mazzoni & Lucrezia Lamastra, 2025. "Recent Developments, Challenges, and Environmental Benefits of Using Hermetia illucens for Bioenergy Production Within a Circular Economy Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-24, May.
    16. Abdul, Daud & Wenqi, Jiang & Tanveer, Arsalan & Sharaf, Iman Mohamad, 2025. "Analyzing the sustainability factors to prioritize sustainable energy source: A novel integrated MCDM model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    17. Marek Wieruszewski & Aleksandra Górna & Katarzyna Mydlarz & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2022. "Wood Biomass Resources in Poland Depending on Forest Structure and Industrial Processing of Wood Raw Material," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    18. Dragicevic, Arnaud Z. & Thongtai, Chanon & Pecora, Nicolò, 2025. "Assessing the potential for biofuel production within a conventional fuel system," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    19. Béres, Rebeka & van der Wel, Auke & Fattahi, Amir & van den Broek, Machteld, 2024. "The impact of national policies on Europe-wide power system transition towards net-zero 2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    20. Wang, Shuaijie & Guan, Xin & Liu, Shu, 2025. "Cost-effective hybrid renewable energy strategies for rural Electrification: Optimization-based evaluation of grid-connected and Islanded microgrid systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:18:p:4857-:d:1748161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.