Author
Listed:
- H. M. Mahmudul
(School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia
Centre for Hydrogen and Renewable Energy, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia)
- M. G. Rasul
(School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia
Centre for Hydrogen and Renewable Energy, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia)
- R. Narayanan
(School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia
Centre for Hydrogen and Renewable Energy, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia)
- D. Akbar
(School of Business and Law, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia)
- M. M. Hasan
(School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia
Centre for Hydrogen and Renewable Energy, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia)
Abstract
This study evaluates biogas production through the anaerobic digestion of food waste (FW), cow dung (CD), and green waste (GW), with the primary objective of determining the efficacy of co-digesting these organic wastes commonly generated by households and small farms in Central Queensland, Australia. The investigation focuses on both experimental and technoeconomic aspects to support the development of accessible and sustainable energy solutions. A batch anaerobic digestion process was employed using a 1 L jacketed glass digester, simulating small-scale conditions, while technoeconomic feasibility was projected onto a 500 L digester operated without temperature control, reflecting realistic constraints for decentralized rural or residential systems. Three feedstock mixtures (100% FW, 50:50 FW:CD, and 50:25:25 FW:CD:GW) were tested to determine their impact on biogas yield and methane concentration. Experiments were conducted over 14 days, during which biogas production and methane content were monitored. The results showed that FW alone produced the highest biogas volume, but with a low methane concentration of 25%. Co-digestion with CD and GW enhanced methane quality, achieving a methane yield of 48% while stabilizing the digestion process. A technoeconomic analysis was conducted based on the experimental results to estimate the viability of a 500 L biodigester for small-scale use. The evaluation considered costs, benefits, and financial metrics, including Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and Dynamic Payback Period (DPP). The biodigester demonstrated strong economic potential, with an NPV of AUD 2834, an IRR of 13.5%, and a payback period of 3.2 years. This study highlights the significance of optimizing feedstock composition and integrating economic assessments with experimental findings to support the adoption of biogas systems as a sustainable energy solution for small-scale, off-grid, or rural applications.
Suggested Citation
H. M. Mahmudul & M. G. Rasul & R. Narayanan & D. Akbar & M. M. Hasan, 2025.
"Technoeconomic Assessment of Biogas Production from Organic Waste via Anaerobic Digestion in Subtropical Central Queensland, Australia,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-16, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4505-:d:1732146
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4505-:d:1732146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.