Author
Listed:
- Boyang Qu
(School of Electrical and Automation Engineering, Liaoning Institute of Science and Technology, Benxi 117004, China)
- Zhaojun Meng
(School of Electrical and Automation Engineering, Liaoning Institute of Science and Technology, Benxi 117004, China)
Abstract
To address the challenges of power generation rights trading and profit distribution in the integrated energy system of multi-park combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) with new energy grid integration, we constructed a hierarchical game model involving multi-energy system aggregators. By having aggregators price electricity, heat, cold, and carbon costs, the model establishes a hierarchical game framework with the linkage of the four prices (electricity, heat, cold, and carbon), achieving inter-park peer-to-peer (P2P) multi-energy dynamic price matching for the first time. It aims to coordinate distribution network dispatching, renewable energy, energy storage, gas turbine units, demand response, cooling–heating–power coupling, and inter-park P2P multi-energy interaction. With the goal of optimizing the profits of integrated energy aggregators, a hierarchical game mechanism is established, which integrates power generation rights trading models and incentive-based demand response. The upper layer of this mechanism is the profit function of integrated energy aggregators, while the lower layer is the cost function of park microgrid alliances. A hierarchical game mechanism with Two-Level Optimization, integrating the Adaptive Disturbance Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization (ADQPSO) algorithm and the branch and bound method (ADQPSO-Driven Branch and Bound Two-Level Optimization), is used to determine dynamic prices, thereby realizing dynamic matching of energy supply and demand and cross-park collaborative optimal allocation. Under the hierarchical game mechanism, the convergence speed of the ADQPSO-driven branch and bound method is 40% faster than that of traditional methods, and the optimization profit accuracy is improved by 1.59%. Moreover, compared with a single mechanism, the hierarchical game mechanism (Scenario 4) increases profits by 17.17%. This study provides technical support for the efficient operation of new energy grid integration and the achievement of “dual-carbon” goals.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:16:p:4251-:d:1721503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.