IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i14p3783-d1703366.html

Prediction of Temperature Distribution with Deep Learning Approaches for SM1 Flame Configuration

Author

Listed:
  • Gökhan Deveci

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yeditepe University, Istanbul 34755, Turkey
    Numesys Inc., Istanbul 34758, Turkey)

  • Özgün Yücel

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli 41400, Turkey)

  • Ali Bahadır Olcay

    (Padnos College of Engineering, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, MI 49504, USA)

Abstract

This study investigates the application of deep learning (DL) techniques for predicting temperature fields in the SM1 swirl-stabilized turbulent non-premixed flame. Two distinct DL approaches were developed using a comprehensive CFD database generated via the steady laminar flamelet model coupled with the SST k-ω turbulence model. The first approach employs a fully connected dense neural network to directly map scalar input parameters—fuel velocity, swirl ratio, and equivalence ratio—to high-resolution temperature contour images. In addition, a comparison was made with different deep learning networks, namely Res-Net, EfficientNetB0, and Inception Net V3, to better understand the performance of the model. In the first approach, the results of the Inception V3 model and the developed Dense Model were found to be better than Res-Net and Efficient Net. At the same time, file sizes and usability were examined. The second framework employs a U-Net-based convolutional neural network enhanced by an RGB Fusion preprocessing technique, which integrates multiple scalar fields from non-reacting (cold flow) conditions into composite images, significantly improving spatial feature extraction. The training and validation processes for both models were conducted using 80% of the CFD data for training and 20% for testing, which helped assess their ability to generalize new input conditions. In the secondary approach, similar to the first approach, studies were conducted with different deep learning models, namely Res-Net, Efficient Net, and Inception Net, to evaluate model performance. The U-Net model, which is well developed, stands out with its low error and small file size. The dense network is appropriate for direct parametric analyses, while the image-based U-Net model provides a rapid and scalable option to utilize the cold flow CFD images. This framework can be further refined in future research to estimate more flow factors and tested against experimental measurements for enhanced applicability.

Suggested Citation

  • Gökhan Deveci & Özgün Yücel & Ali Bahadır Olcay, 2025. "Prediction of Temperature Distribution with Deep Learning Approaches for SM1 Flame Configuration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-29, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3783-:d:1703366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/14/3783/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/14/3783/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elmaz, Furkan & Yücel, Özgün & Mutlu, Ali Yener, 2020. "Predictive modeling of biomass gasification with machine learning-based regression methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Shuguang & Leng, Yuchi & Chaturvedi, Rishabh & Dutta, Ashit Kumar & Abdullaeva, Barno Sayfutdinovna & Fouad, Yasser, 2024. "Sustainable freshwater/energy supply through geothermal-centered layout tailored with humidification-dehumidification desalination unit; Optimized by regression machine learning techniques," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    2. Santhappan, Joseph Sekhar & Boddu, Muralikrishna & Gopinath, Arun S. & Mathimani, Thangavel, 2024. "Analysis of 27 supervised machine learning models for the co-gasification assessment of peanut shell and spent tea residue in an open-core downdraft gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    3. Sahar Safarian & Seyed Mohammad Ebrahimi Saryazdi & Runar Unnthorsson & Christiaan Richter, 2021. "Artificial Neural Network Modeling of Bioethanol Production Via Syngas Fermentation," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Pourali, Mostafa & Esfahani, Javad Abolfazli, 2022. "Performance analysis of a micro-scale integrated hydrogen production system by analytical approach, machine learning, and response surface methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    5. Ascher, Simon & Watson, Ian & You, Siming, 2022. "Machine learning methods for modelling the gasification and pyrolysis of biomass and waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    6. Ayub, Yousaf & Hu, Yusha & Ren, Jingzheng, 2023. "Estimation of syngas yield in hydrothermal gasification process by application of artificial intelligence models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    7. Namita Kumari & Ankush Sharma & Binh Tran & Naveen Chilamkurti & Damminda Alahakoon, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review of Digital Twin Technology for Grid-Connected Microgrid Systems: State of the Art, Potential and Challenges Faced," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Paramasivam, Prabhu & Alruqi, Mansoor & Ağbulut, Ümit, 2025. "Experimental simulation and analysis of Acacia Nilotica biomass gasification with XGBoost and SHapley Additive Explanations to determine the importance of key features," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    9. Onsree, Thossaporn & Tippayawong, Nakorn, 2021. "Machine learning application to predict yields of solid products from biomass torrefaction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 425-432.
    10. Huang, Chengwei & Xu, Jialing & Xu, Shuai & Shan, Murong & Liu, Shanke & Yu, Lijun, 2024. "Optimizing H2 production from biomass: A machine learning-enhanced model of supercritical water gasification dynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    11. Ifaei, Pouya & Nazari-Heris, Morteza & Tayerani Charmchi, Amir Saman & Asadi, Somayeh & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2023. "Sustainable energies and machine learning: An organized review of recent applications and challenges," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    12. Safarian, Sahar & Ebrahimi Saryazdi, Seyed Mohammad & Unnthorsson, Runar & Richter, Christiaan, 2020. "Artificial neural network integrated with thermodynamic equilibrium modeling of downdraft biomass gasification-power production plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    13. Onsree, Thossaporn & Tippayawong, Nakorn & Phithakkitnukoon, Santi & Lauterbach, Jochen, 2022. "Interpretable machine-learning model with a collaborative game approach to predict yields and higher heating value of torrefied biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    14. Ascher, Simon & Sloan, William & Watson, Ian & You, Siming, 2022. "A comprehensive artificial neural network model for gasification process prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    15. Ma, Zherui & Wang, Jiangjiang & Feng, Yingsong & Wang, Ruikun & Zhao, Zhenghui & Chen, Hongwei, 2023. "Hydrogen yield prediction for supercritical water gasification based on generative adversarial network data augmentation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    16. Hugo Gaspar Hernandez-Palma & Jonny Rafael Plaza Alvarado & Jesús Enrique García Guiliany & Guilherme Luiz Dotto & Claudete Gindri Ramos, 2024. "Implications of Machine Learning in the Generation of Renewable Energies in Latin America from a Globalized Vision: A Systematic Review," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(2), pages 1-10, March.
    17. Md Sumon Reza & Zhanar Baktybaevna Iskakova & Shammya Afroze & Kairat Kuterbekov & Asset Kabyshev & Kenzhebatyr Zh. Bekmyrza & Marzhan M. Kubenova & Muhammad Saifullah Abu Bakar & Abul K. Azad & Hrido, 2023. "Influence of Catalyst on the Yield and Quality of Bio-Oil for the Catalytic Pyrolysis of Biomass: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-39, July.
    18. Olca, Kadriye Deniz & Yücel, Özgün, 2024. "Unveiling the potential of operating time in improving machine learning models’ performance for waste biomass gasification systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PA).
    19. Pierdicca, Roberto & Balestra, Mattia & Micheletti, Giulia & Felicetti, Andrea & Toscano, Giuseppe, 2022. "Semi-automatic detection and segmentation of wooden pellet size exploiting a deep learning approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 406-416.
    20. Zhang, Bowei & Guo, Simao & Jin, Hui, 2022. "Production forecast analysis of BP neural network based on Yimin lignite supercritical water gasification experiment results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3783-:d:1703366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.