IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i13p3487-d1692940.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Methodological Framework for Studying the Tilt Angle of Solar Photovoltaic Panels

Author

Listed:
  • Vitālijs Osadčuks

    (Faculty of Engineering and Information Technologies, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Čakstes blvd. 5, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia)

  • Dainis Berjoza

    (Faculty of Engineering and Information Technologies, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Čakstes blvd. 5, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia)

  • Jānis Lāceklis-Bertmanis

    (Faculty of Engineering and Information Technologies, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Čakstes blvd. 5, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia)

  • Ināra Jurgena

    (Faculty of Engineering and Information Technologies, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Čakstes blvd. 5, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia)

Abstract

With the development of alternative energy technologies, energy production from renewable sources is gaining wide application. One of the types of renewable energy sources is solar power. In the past 5 years, solar cells have become very popular for both private electricity microgeneration and large power plants. There are two main options for installing solar photovoltaic panels: on the roof of a house or the ground; on specially made frames. When installing solar cells on the roof, it is not always possible to choose a tilt angle that is appropriate for all seasons, since the angle is mainly adjusted to the plane of the roof. When installing solar cells on the ground, it is usually possible to choose both the orientation relative to the cardinal points and the tilt angle relative to the ground. There are various theories about the best tilt angle of solar cells for producing the most amount of energy during the year. Therefore, the aim of the present research study is to develop an original research methodology for determining an optimal tilt angle for solar cells. The research study examined six different tilt angles of solar cells, 0°, 30°, 35° 40° 45° and 50°, orienting the cells towards the south. The research study used 18 identical monocrystalline solar panels with a power of 20 W. Three solar panels were set at each angle. This way, the experiment had three replications at each angle of the solar cells. The measurements were recorded by a GWL840 data logger with an interval of 10 s. The experiment was conducted by placing all solar cell modules on the roof of the building at Lat. 56.66181° and Long. 23.75238°. During the experimental period, the highest efficiency was found for the solar panels set at 50° and 40°, reaching the total solar irradiation of 266.61 Wm −2 and 266.27 Wm −2 , respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Vitālijs Osadčuks & Dainis Berjoza & Jānis Lāceklis-Bertmanis & Ināra Jurgena, 2025. "A Methodological Framework for Studying the Tilt Angle of Solar Photovoltaic Panels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3487-:d:1692940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3487/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3487/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramez Abdallah & Adel Juaidi & Salameh Abdel-Fattah & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro, 2020. "Estimating the Optimum Tilt Angles for South-Facing Surfaces in Palestine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, February.
    2. Benghanem, M., 2011. "Optimization of tilt angle for solar panel: Case study for Madinah, Saudi Arabia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1427-1433, April.
    3. Kafka, Jennifer & Miller, Mark A., 2020. "The dual angle solar harvest (DASH) method: An alternative method for organizing large solar panel arrays that optimizes incident solar energy in conjunction with land use," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 531-546.
    4. Babatunde, A.A. & Abbasoglu, S. & Senol, M., 2018. "Analysis of the impact of dust, tilt angle and orientation on performance of PV Plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 1017-1026.
    5. Conceição, Ricardo & Silva, Hugo G. & Fialho, Luis & Lopes, Francis M. & Collares-Pereira, Manuel, 2019. "PV system design with the effect of soiling on the optimum tilt angle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 787-796.
    6. Ullah, Asad & Imran, Hassan & Maqsood, Zaki & Butt, Nauman Zafar, 2019. "Investigation of optimal tilt angles and effects of soiling on PV energy production in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 830-843.
    7. Xu, Luting & Long, Enshen & Wei, Jincheng & Cheng, Zhu & Zheng, Hanjie, 2021. "A new approach to determine the optimum tilt angle and orientation of solar collectors in mountainous areas with high altitude," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gönül, Ömer & Yazar, Fatih & Duman, A. Can & Güler, Önder, 2022. "A comparative techno-economic assessment of manually adjustable tilt mechanisms and automatic solar trackers for behind-the-meter PV applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Conceição, Ricardo & González-Aguilar, José & Merrouni, Ahmed Alami & Romero, Manuel, 2022. "Soiling effect in solar energy conversion systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Oh, Myeongchan & Kim, Jin-Young & Kim, Boyoung & Yun, Chang-Yeol & Kim, Chang Ki & Kang, Yong-Heack & Kim, Hyun-Goo, 2021. "Tolerance angle concept and formula for practical optimal orientation of photovoltaic panels," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 384-394.
    4. Rehman, Tauseef-ur & Qaisrani, Mumtaz A. & Shafiq, M. Basit & Baba, Yousra Filali & Aslfattahi, Navid & Shahsavar, Amin & Cheema, Taqi Ahmad & Park, Cheol Woo, 2025. "Global perspectives on advancing photovoltaic system performance—A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    5. Barbón, A. & Fortuny Ayuso, P. & Bayón, L. & Silva, C.A., 2023. "Experimental and numerical investigation of the influence of terrain slope on the performance of single-axis trackers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    6. Chiteka, Kudzanayi & Arora, Rajesh & Sridhara, S.N. & Enweremadu, C.C., 2021. "Optimizing wind barrier and photovoltaic array configuration in soiling mitigation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 225-236.
    7. Krzysztof Kupiec & Barbara Król, 2025. "Optimal Collector Tilt Angle to Maximize Solar Fraction in Residential Heating Systems: A Numerical Study for Temperate Climates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Nicolás-Martín, Carolina & Santos-Martín, David & Chinchilla-Sánchez, Mónica & Lemon, Scott, 2020. "A global annual optimum tilt angle model for photovoltaic generation to use in the absence of local meteorological data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 722-735.
    9. Moon Keun Kim & Khalid Osman Abdulkadir & Jiying Liu & Joon-Ho Choi & Huiqing Wen, 2021. "Optimal Design Strategy of a Solar Reflector Combining Photovoltaic Panels to Improve Electricity Output: A Case Study in Calgary, Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Chinchilla, Monica & Santos-Martín, David & Carpintero-Rentería, Miguel & Lemon, Scott, 2021. "Worldwide annual optimum tilt angle model for solar collectors and photovoltaic systems in the absence of site meteorological data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    11. Girma T. Chala & Shaharin A. Sulaiman & Xuecheng Chen, 2025. "A Study on the Performance of Soiled Solar Photovoltaic Panels at Different Tilt Angles in Al Seeb, Oman," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-18, January.
    12. Dragos Machidon & Marcel Istrate, 2023. "Tilt Angle Adjustment for Incident Solar Energy Increase: A Case Study for Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-12, April.
    13. Al Garni, Hassan Z. & Awasthi, Anjali & Wright, David, 2019. "Optimal orientation angles for maximizing energy yield for solar PV in Saudi Arabia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 538-550.
    14. Liu, Yujun & Yao, Ling & Jiang, Hou & Lu, Ning & Qin, Jun & Liu, Tang & Zhou, Chenghu, 2022. "Spatial estimation of the optimum PV tilt angles in China by incorporating ground with satellite data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1249-1258.
    15. Rinchi, Bilal & Dababseh, Raghad & Jubran, Mayar & Al-Dahidi, Sameer & Abdalla, Mohammed E.B. & Ayadi, Osama, 2025. "Global prediction of optimal solar panel tilt angles via machine learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
    16. Faris Alqurashi & Rached Nciri & Abdulrahman Alghamdi & Chaouki Ali & Faouzi Nasri, 2022. "Control of the Solar Radiation Reception Rate (SRRR) Using a Novel Poly-Tilted Segmented Panel (PTSP) in the Region of Makkah, Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, March.
    17. Zhong, Qing & Tong, Daoqin, 2020. "Spatial layout optimization for solar photovoltaic (PV) panel installation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 1-11.
    18. Alkharusi, Tarik & Huang, Gan & Markides, Christos N., 2024. "Characterisation of soiling on glass surfaces and their impact on optical and solar photovoltaic performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    19. Essa Alhamer & Addison Grigsby & Rydge Mulford, 2022. "The Influence of Seasonal Cloud Cover, Ambient Temperature and Seasonal Variations in Daylight Hours on the Optimal PV Panel Tilt Angle in the United States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-14, October.
    20. Aditya Rachman & Usman Rianse & Mustarum Musaruddin & Kurniati Ornam, 2015. "Technical, Economical and Environmental Assessments of the Solar Photovoltaic Technology in Southeast Sulawesi, a Developing Province in Eastern Indonesia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 5(4), pages 918-925.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3487-:d:1692940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.