IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i13p3447-d1691639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermogravimetric Analysis of Blended Fuel of Pig Manure, Straw, and Coal

Author

Listed:
  • Chengzhe Shen

    (Sanhe Power Generation Co., Ltd., Sanhe 065201, China)

  • Yan Zhang

    (Sanhe Power Generation Co., Ltd., Sanhe 065201, China)

  • Gengsheng Liu

    (Sanhe Power Generation Co., Ltd., Sanhe 065201, China)

  • Dongxu Wang

    (Sanhe Power Generation Co., Ltd., Sanhe 065201, China)

  • Jinbao Zhang

    (Sanhe Power Generation Co., Ltd., Sanhe 065201, China)

  • Kai Yang

    (Sanhe Power Generation Co., Ltd., Sanhe 065201, China)

  • Xintong Wen

    (Sanhe Power Generation Co., Ltd., Sanhe 065201, China)

  • Quan Sun

    (Sanhe Power Generation Co., Ltd., Sanhe 065201, China)

  • Xuejun Dou

    (Sanhe Power Generation Co., Ltd., Sanhe 065201, China)

  • Yong Zhang

    (Yantai Longyuan Power Technology Co., Ltd., Yantai 264006, China)

  • Jingwen Mao

    (State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Lei Deng

    (State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

Abstract

This study investigated the combustion performance of pig manure, straw, and coal at various blending ratios using thermogravimetric analysis. The synergistic effect of coal and pig manure at various ratios was analyzed, and kinetic analysis was performed using the Coats–Redfern method. The results showed that the overall combustion performance and stability of the blended fuel improved as the blending ratio of pig manure and straw increased. Increasing the ratio of pig manure reduced the ignition temperature of blended fuel from 696 K to 675 K. Additionally, the combustion of pig manure and coal exhibited a significant synergistic effect, strongest at a 5% blending ratio. For combustion reactions with conversion rates between 0.2 and 0.8, the activation energy required was 75.82 kJ mol −1 for a 10% pig manure blending ratio and 44.33 kJ mol⁻ 1 for a 30% blending ratio. These results demonstrate that lower activation energies suggest that the combustion reaction is more likely to proceed. The activation energy of straw was higher than that of pig manure at all blending ratios. These findings suggest that pig manure burns more easily when blended with coal than straw.

Suggested Citation

  • Chengzhe Shen & Yan Zhang & Gengsheng Liu & Dongxu Wang & Jinbao Zhang & Kai Yang & Xintong Wen & Quan Sun & Xuejun Dou & Yong Zhang & Jingwen Mao & Lei Deng, 2025. "Thermogravimetric Analysis of Blended Fuel of Pig Manure, Straw, and Coal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3447-:d:1691639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3447/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3447/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xie, Candie & Liu, Jingyong & Zhang, Xiaochun & Xie, Wuming & Sun, Jian & Chang, Kenlin & Kuo, Jiahong & Xie, Wenhao & Liu, Chao & Sun, Shuiyu & Buyukada, Musa & Evrendilek, Fatih, 2018. "Co-combustion thermal conversion characteristics of textile dyeing sludge and pomelo peel using TGA and artificial neural networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 786-795.
    2. Shen, Xiuli & Huang, Guangqun & Yang, Zengling & Han, Lujia, 2015. "Compositional characteristics and energy potential of Chinese animal manure by type and as a whole," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 108-119.
    3. Naqvi, Salman Raza & Tariq, Rumaisa & Hameed, Zeeshan & Ali, Imtiaz & Naqvi, Muhammad & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Ceylan, Selim & Rashid, Harith & Ahmad, Junaid & Taqvi, Syed A. & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2019. "Pyrolysis of high ash sewage sludge: Kinetics and thermodynamic analysis using Coats-Redfern method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 854-860.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Zhibin & Wang, Li & Huang, Zhiwei & Zhuang, Ping & Shi, Yiguang & Evrendilek, Fatih & Huang, Shengzheng & He, Yao & Liu, Jingyong, 2024. "Dynamic and optimal ash-to-gas responses of oxy-fuel and air combustions of soil remediation biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    2. Jiang, Chunlong & Zhou, Wenliang & Bi, Haobo & Ni, Zhanshi & Sun, Hao & Lin, Qizhao, 2022. "Co-pyrolysis of coal slime and cattle manure by TG–FTIR–MS and artificial neural network modeling: Pyrolysis behavior, kinetics, gas emission characteristics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    3. Sun, Hao & Bi, Haobo & Jiang, Chunlong & Ni, Zhanshi & Tian, Junjian & Zhou, Wenliang & Qiu, Zhicong & Lin, Qizhao, 2022. "Experimental study of the co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and wet waste via TG-FTIR-GC and artificial neural network model: Synergistic effect, pyrolysis kinetics and gas products," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1-14.
    4. Song, Yapeng & Hu, Wanrong & Qiao, Wei & Westerholm, Maria & Wandera, Simon M. & Dong, Renjie, 2022. "Upgrading the performance of high solids feeding anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under extremely high ammonia level," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 13-20.
    5. Wen, Shaoting & Buyukada, Musa & Evrendilek, Fatih & Liu, Jingyong, 2020. "Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of co-combustion/pyrolysis of textile dyeing sludge and incense sticks: Regression and machine-learning models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 463-474.
    6. Mattes Scheftelowitz & Daniela Thrän, 2016. "Unlocking the Energy Potential of Manure—An Assessment of the Biogas Production Potential at the Farm Level in Germany," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-13, April.
    7. Shahbeig, Hossein & Nosrati, Mohsen, 2020. "Pyrolysis of municipal sewage sludge for bioenergy production: Thermo-kinetic studies, evolved gas analysis, and techno-socio-economic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Wainaina, Steven & Rajendran, Karthik & Kumar, Sumit & Quan, Wang & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Chen, Hongyu & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang , 2019. "A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 115-131.
    9. Roffeis, Martin & Fitches, Elaine C. & Wakefield, Maureen E. & Almeida, Joana & Alves Valada, Tatiana R. & Devic, Emilie & Koné, N’Golopé & Kenis, Marc & Nacambo, Saidou & Koko, Gabriel K.D. & Mathijs, 2020. "Ex-ante life cycle impact assessment of insect based feed production in West Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    10. Ferfari, Oussama & Belaadi, Ahmed & Bourchak, Mostefa & Ghernaout, Djamel & Ajaj, Rafic M. & Chai, Boon Xian, 2024. "Thermal decomposition of Syagrus romanzoffiana palm fibers: Thermodynamic and kinetic studies using the coats-redfern method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    11. Jiang, Chunlong & Lin, Qizhao & Wang, Chengxin & Jiang, Xuedan & Bi, Haobo & Bao, Lin, 2020. "Experimental study of the ignition and combustion characteristics of cattle manure under different environmental conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    12. Alam, Mahboob & Bhavanam, Anjireddy & Jana, Ashirbad & Viroja, Jaimin kumar S. & Peela, Nageswara Rao, 2020. "Co-pyrolysis of bamboo sawdust and plastic: Synergistic effects and kinetics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1133-1145.
    13. Yuan, Xinsong & He, Tao & Cao, Hongliang & Yuan, Qiaoxia, 2017. "Cattle manure pyrolysis process: Kinetic and thermodynamic analysis with isoconversional methods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 489-496.
    14. Bryan Chiguano-Tapia & Elena Diaz & M. Angeles de la Rubia & Angel F. Mohedano, 2025. "Co-Hydrothermal Carbonization of Swine Manure and Soybean Hulls: Synergistic Effects on the Potential Use of Hydrochar as a Biofuel and Soil Improver," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Nawaz, Ahmad & Kumar, Pradeep, 2022. "Elucidating the bioenergy potential of raw, hydrothermally carbonized and torrefied waste Arundo donax biomass in terms of physicochemical characterization, kinetic and thermodynamic parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 844-856.
    16. Bi, Haobo & Wang, Chengxin & Lin, Qizhao & Jiang, Xuedan & Jiang, Chunlong & Bao, Lin, 2020. "Combustion behavior, kinetics, gas emission characteristics and artificial neural network modeling of coal gangue and biomass via TG-FTIR," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    17. Lin, Sen & Li, Liangzhong & Wei, Zebin & Liang, Jiayu & Lin, Ziting & Evrendilek, Fatih & He, Yao & Ninomiya, Yoshihiko & Xie, Wuming & Sun, Shuiyu & Liu, Jingyong, 2025. "CO2-induced co-pyrolysis of Pennisetum hydridum and waste tires: Multi-objective optimization of its synergies and pyrolytic oil, char and gas outputs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    18. Wen, Yuming & Zaini, Ilman Nuran & Wang, Shule & Mu, Wangzhong & Jönsson, Pär Göran & Yang, Weihong, 2021. "Synergistic effect of the co-pyrolysis of cardboard and polyethylene: A kinetic and thermodynamic study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    19. Martin Roffeis & Joana Almeida & Maureen Elizabeth Wakefield & Tatiana Raquel Alves Valada & Emilie Devic & N’Golopé Koné & Marc Kenis & Saidou Nacambo & Elaine Charlotte Fitches & Gabriel K. D. Koko , 2017. "Life Cycle Inventory Analysis of Prospective Insect Based Feed Production in West Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-27, September.
    20. Chen, Jianbiao & Gao, Shuaifei & Xu, Fang & Xu, Wenhao & Yang, Yuanjiang & Kong, Depeng & Wang, Yinfeng & Yao, Huicong & Chen, Haijun & Zhu, Yuezhao & Mu, Lin, 2022. "Influence of moisture and feedstock form on the pyrolysis behaviors, pyrolytic gas production, and residues micro-structure evolutions of an industrial sludge from a steel production enterprise," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3447-:d:1691639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.