Author
Listed:
- Zixiang Han
(School of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)
- Shuaifeng Lyu
(School of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)
- Yuhang Xiao
(Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China)
- Haijun Zhang
(School of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Wuhan Center of Geological Survey, China Geological Survey, Wuhan 430205, China)
- Quanming Chen
(School of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)
- Ao Lu
(School of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)
Abstract
The efficiency of coalbed methane (CBM) extraction is closely related to the drilling response of coal seams, which is significantly influenced by natural fracture development of coal seams. This work investigated 11 coal samples from the Baode, Xinyuan, and Huolinhe mines, employing quantitative fracture characterization, acoustic wave testing, drilling experiments, and cuttings analysis to systematically reveal the relationships and mechanisms between fracture parameters and coal drilling response characteristics. The result found that acoustic parameters (average wave velocity v and drilling surface wave velocity v 0 ) exhibit significant negative correlations with fracture line density ( ρ 1 ) and area ratio ( ρ 2 ) (|r| > 0.7), while the geological strength index (GSI) positively correlates with acoustic parameters, confirming their utility as indirect indicators of fracture development. Fracture area ratio ( ρ 2 ) strongly correlates with drilling cuttings rate q (r = 0.82), whereas GSI negatively correlates with drilling rate w , indicating that highly fractured coal is more friable but structural stability constrains drilling efficiency, while fracture parameters show limited influence on drill cuttings quantity Q . Cuttings characteristics vary with fracture types and density. Type I coal (low-density coexisting exogenous fractures and cleats) produces cuttings dominated by fine particles with concentrated size distribution (average particle size d ≈ 0.52 mm, crushability index n = 0.46–0.61). Type II coal (exogenous-fracture-dominant) exhibits coarser particle sizes in cuttings ( d ≈ 0.8 mm, n = 0.43–0.53). Type III coal (dense-cleat-dominant) drill cuttings are mainly coarse particles and are concentrated in distribution ( d ≈ 1.53 mm, n = 0.72–0.98). Additionally, drilling response differences are governed by the coupling effects of vitrinite reflectance (R o ), density, and firmness coefficient ( f ), with Huolinhe coal being easier to drill due to its lower R o , f , and density. This study elucidates the mechanism by which fracture development affects coal drilling response through multi-parameter correlation analysis, while also providing novel insights into the optimization of fracturing sweet spot selection for CBM development.
Suggested Citation
Zixiang Han & Shuaifeng Lyu & Yuhang Xiao & Haijun Zhang & Quanming Chen & Ao Lu, 2025.
"Effects of Natural Fractures on Coal Drilling Response: Implications for CBM Fracturing Optimization,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-26, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3404-:d:1689600
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3404-:d:1689600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.