IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i11p2864-d1668352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Microstructure-Driven Hygrothermal Behavior of Mycelium-Based Composites for Bio-Based Insulation

Author

Listed:
  • Sina Motamedi

    (Research Group in Energy Technologies and Energy Efficiency (t3e), École de Technologie Supérieure (ÉTS), Université du Québec, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada)

  • Daniel R. Rousse

    (Research Group in Energy Technologies and Energy Efficiency (t3e), École de Technologie Supérieure (ÉTS), Université du Québec, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada)

  • Geoffrey Promis

    (University of Picardie Jules Verne, Innovative Technologies Laboratory (LTI), 80025 Amiens Cedex, France)

Abstract

This study investigates the coupled hygrothermal behavior of mycelium-based composites (MBCs) as a function of their microstructural organization, governed by fungal species, substrate type, additive incorporation, and treatment method. Eleven composite formulations were selected and characterized using a multi-scale experimental approach, combining scanning electron microscopy, dynamic vapor sorption, vapor permeability tests, capillary uptake measurements, and transient thermal conductivity analysis. SEM analysis revealed that Ganoderma lucidum forms dense and interconnected hyphal networks, whereas Trametes versicolor generates looser, localized structures. These morphological differences directly influence water vapor transport and heat conduction. Additive-enriched composites exhibited up to 21.8% higher moisture uptake at 90% RH, while straw-based composites demonstrated higher capillary uptake and free water saturation (up to 704 kg/m 3 ), indicating enhanced moisture sensitivity. In contrast, hemp-based formulations with Ganoderma lucidum showed reduced sorption and vapor permeability due to limited pore interconnectivity. Thermal conductivity varied nonlinearly with temperature and moisture content. Fitting the experimental data with an exponential model revealed a moisture sensitivity coefficient thirty times lower for GHOP compared to VHOP, highlighting the stabilizing effect of a compact microstructure. The distinction between total and effective porosity emerged as a key factor in explaining discrepancies between apparent and functional moisture behavior. These findings demonstrate that hygric and thermal properties in MBCs are governed not by porosity alone, but by the geometry and connectivity of the internal fungal network. Optimizing these structural features enables fine control overheat and mass transfer, laying the groundwork for the development of high-performance, bio-based insulation materials.

Suggested Citation

  • Sina Motamedi & Daniel R. Rousse & Geoffrey Promis, 2025. "Microstructure-Driven Hygrothermal Behavior of Mycelium-Based Composites for Bio-Based Insulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-25, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:11:p:2864-:d:1668352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/11/2864/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/11/2864/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisa Stelzer & Friederike Hoberg & Vanessa Bach & Bertram Schmidt & Sven Pfeiffer & Vera Meyer & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Fungal-Based Composite Bricks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Yvan Dutil & Daniel Rousse & Guillermo Quesada, 2011. "Sustainable Buildings: An Ever Evolving Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karel Struhala & Miroslav Čekon & Richard Slávik, 2018. "Life Cycle Assessment of Solar Façade Concepts Based on Transparent Insulation Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Yunsong Han & Hong Yu & Cheng Sun, 2017. "Simulation-Based Multiobjective Optimization of Timber-Glass Residential Buildings in Severe Cold Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Ana Ferreira & Manuel Duarte Pinheiro & Jorge de Brito & Ricardo Mateus, 2022. "Embodied vs. Operational Energy and Carbon in Retail Building Shells: A Case Study in Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Jukka Heinonen & Antti-Juhani Säynäjoki & Matti Kuronen & Seppo Junnila, 2012. "Are the Greenhouse Gas Implications of New Residential Developments Understood Wrongly?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Riikka Kyrö & Jukka Heinonen & Antti Säynäjoki & Seppo Junnila, 2012. "Assessing the Potential of Climate Change Mitigation Actions in Three Different City Types in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(7), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Kajetan Sadowski, 2021. "Implementation of the New European Bauhaus Principles as a Context for Teaching Sustainable Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Stefano Cascone, 2019. "Green Roof Design: State of the Art on Technology and Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-27, May.
    8. Helena Nydahl & Staffan Andersson & Anders P. Åstrand & Thomas Olofsson, 2019. "Environmental Performance Measures to Assess Building Refurbishment from a Life Cycle Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Sina Motamedi & Daniel R. Rousse & Geoffrey Promis, 2023. "The Evolution of Crop-Based Materials in the Built Environment: A Review of the Applications, Performance, and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-29, July.
    10. Eeva-Sofia Säynäjoki & Pia Korba & Elina Kalliala & Aino-Kaisa Nuotio, 2018. "GHG Emissions Reduction through Urban Planners’ Improved Control over Earthworks: A Case Study in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Vicent Penadés-Plà & Tatiana García-Segura & José V. Martí & Víctor Yepes, 2016. "A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Applied to the Sustainable Bridge Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Puyi Wang & Yew Hoong Wong & Chou Yong Tan & Sheng Li & Wen Tong Chong, 2022. "Vertical Greening Systems: Technological Benefits, Progresses and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    13. Stefano Cascone & Renata Rapisarda & Dario Cascone, 2019. "Physical Properties of Straw Bales as a Construction Material: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Jukka Heinonen & Antti Säynäjoki & Seppo Junnila, 2011. "A Longitudinal Study on the Carbon Emissions of a New Residential Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(8), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Francesco Bianchi & Anna Laura Pisello & Giorgio Baldinelli & Francesco Asdrubali, 2014. "Infrared Thermography Assessment of Thermal Bridges in Building Envelope: Experimental Validation in a Test Room Setup," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-14, October.
    16. Neil Burford & Rod Jones & Stephen Reynolds & David Rodley, 2016. "Macro Micro Studio: A Prototype Energy Autonomous Laboratory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-25, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:11:p:2864-:d:1668352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.