IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i10p2618-d1658986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Two Urban Building Energy Modelling Tools via the Case Study of an Italian Neighbourhood

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara Nardelli

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, 20156 Milano, Italy)

  • Riccardo Colombo

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, 20156 Milano, Italy)

  • Alessia Banfi

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, 20156 Milano, Italy)

  • Martina Ferrando

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, 20156 Milano, Italy)

  • Xing Shi

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, No. 1239 Si Ping Road, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Francesco Causone

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, 20156 Milano, Italy)

Abstract

Urban Building Energy Modelling (UBEM) represents a comprehensive approach to investigate the intricate interplay of the various factors impacting energy use of groups of buildings, offering invaluable insights for urban planners, architects, building engineers, and policymakers. Nonetheless, available UBEM tools are still “research tools” and lack a unified standard addressing input, output, nomenclature, and calculation approaches. In this context, this study aims to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of two of the most used UBEM tools: Integrated Computational Design (iCD), the commercial tool provided by the Integrated Environmental Solutions (IES) company, and Urban Modelling Interface (umi), developed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). The comparative analysis includes each step of the UBEM workflow: the creation of the model, the assignment of input data, energy simulation, and visualisation and exportation of results. The tools are tested through the simulation of a case study to provide insights on the rationale and informed use of the tools, highlighting the risks associated with use by modellers with different levels of expertise. Moreover, this study provides tool developers and the scientific community with suggestions for major areas of improvement and standardisation in the field of UBEM, since substantial differences are still reported with respect to output, input, nomenclature, and calculation approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Nardelli & Riccardo Colombo & Alessia Banfi & Martina Ferrando & Xing Shi & Francesco Causone, 2025. "A Comparative Analysis of Two Urban Building Energy Modelling Tools via the Case Study of an Italian Neighbourhood," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:2618-:d:1658986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/10/2618/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/10/2618/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:2618-:d:1658986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.