IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i10p2603-d1658244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Eddy Current Loss Calculation Techniques for Axial Flux Motors with Printed Circuit Board Windings

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Bauer

    (Electrotechnical Systems of Mechatronics, Kaiserslautern University of Applied Sciences, Schoenstraße 11, 67659 Kaiserslautern, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Daniel Dieterich

    (Electrotechnical Systems of Mechatronics, Kaiserslautern University of Applied Sciences, Schoenstraße 11, 67659 Kaiserslautern, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sven Urschel

    (Electrotechnical Systems of Mechatronics, Kaiserslautern University of Applied Sciences, Schoenstraße 11, 67659 Kaiserslautern, Germany)

Abstract

In slotless machines, the winding conductors are exposed to the magnetic air gap field, which causes additional eddy current losses, thus decreasing efficiency and affecting thermal utilization. This is the case, inter alia, for axial flux motors equipped with printed circuit board windings, where the winding is made of copper–fiberglass epoxy laminations and located in the air gap. The dominant influencing factors are primarily the width of the conducting tracks and the magnetic air gap flux density and frequency. The evaluation time is a crucial constraint when calculating thousands of different designs for design space exploration or performing multi-objective optimizations. Finite element simulations can achieve very precise results, but unlike semi-analytical approximation functions, they are very time-consuming and therefore not the method of choice for design space exploration. This publication provides a comprehensive overview of a selection of different eddy current loss calculation techniques that are applicable for rectangular tracks and round wire windings. A comparison of the calculated results for a finite element simulation is presented for a slotless axial flux machine with printed circuit board windings and rectangular tracks. The calculation time consumed is also compared. The current density distribution of planar conductors of air gap windings differs from that in electrical steel sheets. In contrast to the methods based on steel sheets, only the adapted methods for conductors in air gaps offer acceptable accuracy. A recommendation is provided for the method that offers the best balance between accuracy and computation time for the early-stage design of slotless axial flux machines.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Bauer & Daniel Dieterich & Sven Urschel, 2025. "Comparison of Eddy Current Loss Calculation Techniques for Axial Flux Motors with Printed Circuit Board Windings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:2603-:d:1658244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/10/2603/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/10/2603/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:2603-:d:1658244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.