IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i7p1765-d1371554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation of a 660 MW Ultra-Supercritical Coal-Fired Unit Based on Improved Criteria Importance through Inter-Criteria Correlation and Entropy Weight Method

Author

Listed:
  • Haotian Yuan

    (Collage of Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830049, China)

  • Xiaojing Ma

    (Collage of Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830049, China
    Engineering Research Center of Northwest Energy Carbon Neutrality, Ministry of Education, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830049, China)

  • Zening Cheng

    (Zhundong Energy Research Institute, Xinjiang Tianchi Energy Co., Ltd., Changji 831100, China
    Xinjiang Changji Tebian Energy Co., Ltd., Changji 831100, China)

  • Tusongjiang Kari

    (Collage of Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830049, China)

Abstract

To address the issue of traditional static evaluation models being unable to comprehensively analyze the performance of ultra-supercritical coal-fired units under varying loads, we propose a dynamic comprehensive evaluation model based on the improved Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method and entropy weight method (EWM). The comprehensive performance evaluation index system of ultra-supercritical coal fired units is constructed by examining the boiler performance, turbine performance, plant power performance, environmental performance, and flexible performance of coal-powered units. The CRITIC and EWM methods are used to calculate the weights of the indicators, which are then combined with the static evaluation results. Using a dynamic comprehensive evaluation model, we analyze ultra-supercritical coal-fired units, taking into account time weight. This allows us to obtain the comprehensive dynamic real-time evaluation value of the units under different loads. The research indicates that the weight of the evaluation index is changed when using the dynamic comprehensive evaluation model of the improved CRITIC and EWM. The index with lower weight is increased by 6.2%, while the index with higher weight is decreased by 0.22%. This alteration in weight range can provide a more objective reflection of the relationship between evaluation indicators. This model offers significant advantages in improving evaluation accuracy, weight balance distribution, and generality.

Suggested Citation

  • Haotian Yuan & Xiaojing Ma & Zening Cheng & Tusongjiang Kari, 2024. "Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation of a 660 MW Ultra-Supercritical Coal-Fired Unit Based on Improved Criteria Importance through Inter-Criteria Correlation and Entropy Weight Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:7:p:1765-:d:1371554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/7/1765/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/7/1765/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:7:p:1765-:d:1371554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.