IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i7p1686-d1368683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Method for Evaluating Coalbed Methane Reservoir Productivity Considering Drilling Fluid Damage

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Li

    (CNOOC Research Institute Ltd., CNOOC Building, Yard 6, Taiyanggong South Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100028, China)

  • Lichun Sun

    (CNOOC Research Institute Ltd., CNOOC Building, Yard 6, Taiyanggong South Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100028, China)

  • Zhigang Zhao

    (CNOOC Research Institute Ltd., CNOOC Building, Yard 6, Taiyanggong South Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100028, China)

  • Jian Zhang

    (CNOOC Research Institute Ltd., CNOOC Building, Yard 6, Taiyanggong South Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100028, China)

  • Yong Li

    (College of Geosciences and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, No. 11, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yanjun Meng

    (College of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, No. 79 Yingze Xi Street, Wanbolin District, Taiyuan 030002, China)

  • Lei Wang

    (School of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences Wuhan, 388 Lumo Road, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

In the process of coalbed methane development, drilling fluid and fracturing fluid cannot achieve absolute compatibility with formation. The incompatibility between the working fluid and reservoir will lead to the intrusion of working fluid into the reservoir and cause reservoir pollution. This is a very common phenomenon. There is a large amount of pulverized coal in the coal seam, and the intrusion of working liquid will be combined with the pulverized coal to form cement to block the seepage space in the reservoir. Since pressure relief and fracturing fluid backflow will be performed at the first time after fracturing, the intrusion range of the working fluid is small, generally reaching 10 m to 50 m. Compared with a conventional gas reservoir or shale gas reservoir, the working fluid loss during CBM development will seriously affect the subsequent production project and even make the gas well lose production capacity. On the other hand, in order to avoid this phenomenon, measures such as acidification or volumetric fracturing are sometimes used to improve the seepage environment near the well and near the fracture. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the impacts of working fluid filtration and reservoir reconstruction on production. In this study, a single well productivity evaluation model and sensitivity analysis method considering drilling fluid filtration loss, fracturing fluid filtration loss, reservoir reconstruction and other processes is proposed. The formation mechanism of fluid loss during drilling and fracturing is described, and the productivity evaluation model considering fluid loss is combined with the Langmuir isothermal adsorption equation, steady-state diffusion law, Darcy’s seepage law and Duhamel convolution formation. Combined with the distribution of actual gas reservoir flow characteristics, the sensitivity of single well productivity to gas reservoir porosity, gas reservoir permeability, coal seam adsorption coefficient, working fluid filtration loss and reservoir reconstruction measures are analyzed. Through the analysis and fitting of the actual production data on site, the relationship curve can better fit the field production data, and the evaluation results are in line with the drilling and fracturing conditions at that time and the subsequent production conditions, with small errors. The obtained method is suitable for predicting the productivity of fractured vertical wells in different working conditions and provides a basis for the development and productivity prediction of CBM reservoirs in China and in international cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Li & Lichun Sun & Zhigang Zhao & Jian Zhang & Yong Li & Yanjun Meng & Lei Wang, 2024. "A Method for Evaluating Coalbed Methane Reservoir Productivity Considering Drilling Fluid Damage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:7:p:1686-:d:1368683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/7/1686/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/7/1686/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:7:p:1686-:d:1368683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.