IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i4p797-d1335152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Load Model Validation Framework Applied to Synthetic Turbulent Wind Field Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Paul J. Meyer

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy Systems IWES, 27572 Bremerhaven, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Matthias L. Huhn

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy Systems IWES, 27572 Bremerhaven, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Julia Gottschall

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy Systems IWES, 27572 Bremerhaven, Germany)

Abstract

The validation of aeroelastic load models used for load calculations on wind turbines substantially increases the confidence in the accuracy and correctness of these models. In this contribution, we introduce a framework for the validation of these models, integrating a normalized area metric as an objective, quantifiable validation metric that considers the entire statistical distribution of a model and a benchmark and additionally enables a comparison of model accuracy between sensors of different physical units. The framework is applied to test cases that evaluate varying synthetic turbulent wind fields. Two test cases with a focus on turbulence parameters and abnormal shear conditions based on comprehensive wind measurements at the Testfeld Bremerhaven are used to demonstrate the workflow with four different members using IEC-compliant and measurement-derived wind field parameters, respectively. Along with these measurements, an uncertainty model for synthetic wind fields is introduced to quantify propagated wind measurement uncertainties associated with the measured boundary conditions during a validation campaign. The framework is presented as a straightforward and concise methodology to not only find but also quantify mismatches of load models. Major mismatches are found for wind fields associated with larger uncertainties in the mean wind field due to a reduced spatial resolution of measurements.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul J. Meyer & Matthias L. Huhn & Julia Gottschall, 2024. "Development of a Load Model Validation Framework Applied to Synthetic Turbulent Wind Field Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-24, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:797-:d:1335152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/4/797/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/4/797/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:797-:d:1335152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.