Author
Listed:
- Liqi Ye
(School of Computer Science, University of South China, Hengyang 421200, China
Science and Technology on Reactor System Design Technology Laboratory, Nuclear Power Institute of China, Chengdu 610213, China)
- Zhi Chen
(School of Computer Science, University of South China, Hengyang 421200, China
Science and Technology on Reactor System Design Technology Laboratory, Nuclear Power Institute of China, Chengdu 610213, China)
- Jie Liu
(School of Computer Science, University of South China, Hengyang 421200, China)
- Chao Lin
(Science and Technology on Reactor System Design Technology Laboratory, Nuclear Power Institute of China, Chengdu 610213, China)
- Yifan Jian
(Science and Technology on Reactor System Design Technology Laboratory, Nuclear Power Institute of China, Chengdu 610213, China)
Abstract
In order to improve the reliability and maintainability of rod control power cabinets in nuclear power plants, this paper uses insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs), the key power device of rod control power cabinets, as the object of research on cross-working-condition fault prediction. An improved transfer learning (TL) model based on a temporal convolutional network (TCN) is proposed to solve the problem of low fault prediction accuracy across operating conditions. First, the peak emitter voltage of an IGBT aging dataset is selected as the source domain failure characteristic, and the TCN model is trained after the removal of outliers and noise reduction. Then, the time–frequency features are extracted according to the characteristics of the target domain data, and the target domain representation data are obtained using kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) for dimensionality reduction. Finally, the TCN model trained on the source domain is transferred; the model is fine-tuned according to the target domain data, and the learning rate, the number of hidden layer nodes, and the number of training times in the network model are optimized using the dung beetle optimization (DBO) algorithm to obtain the optimal network, making it more suitable for target sample fault prediction. The prediction results of this TCN model, the long short-term memory (LSTM) model, the gated recurrent unit (GRU) model, and the recursive neural network (RNN) model are compared and analyzed by selecting prediction performance evaluation indexes. The results show that the TCN model has a better predictive effect. Comparing the prediction results of the TCN-based optimized transfer learning model with those of the directly trained TCN model, the mean square error, root mean square error, and mean absolute error are reduced by a factor of two to three, which provides an effective solution for fault prediction across operating conditions.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:447-:d:1320405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.