IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i12p2968-d1416169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Metaheuristic Optimization Methods in Energy Community Scheduling: A Benchmark Study

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo Gomes

    (Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
    Interactive Technologies Institute (ITI), Laboratory for Robotics and Engineering Systems (LARSyS), 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
    Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores: Investigação e Desenvolvimento em Lisboa (INESC-ID), 1000-029 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Lucas Pereira

    (Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
    Interactive Technologies Institute (ITI), Laboratory for Robotics and Engineering Systems (LARSyS), 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Augusto Esteves

    (Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
    Interactive Technologies Institute (ITI), Laboratory for Robotics and Engineering Systems (LARSyS), 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Hugo Morais

    (Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
    Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores: Investigação e Desenvolvimento em Lisboa (INESC-ID), 1000-029 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

The prospect of the energy transition is exciting and sure to benefit multiple aspects of daily life. However, various challenges, such as planning, business models, and energy access are still being tackled. Energy Communities have been gaining traction in the energy transition, as they promote increased integration of Renewable Energy Sources (RESs) and more active participation from the consumers. However, optimization becomes crucial to support decision making and the quality of service for the effective functioning of Energy Communities. Optimization in the context of Energy Communities has been explored in the literature, with increasing attention to metaheuristic approaches. This paper contributes to the ongoing body of work by presenting the results of a benchmark between three classical metaheuristic methods—Differential Evolution (DE), the Genetic Algorithm (GA), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)—and three more recent approaches—the Mountain Gazelle Optimizer (MGO), the Dandelion Optimizer (DO), and the Hybrid Adaptive Differential Evolution with Decay Function (HyDE-DF). Our results show that newer methods, especially the Dandelion Optimizer (DO) and the Hybrid Adaptive Differential Evolution with Decay Function (HyDE-DF), tend to be more competitive in terms of minimizing the objective function. In particular, the Hybrid Adaptive Differential Evolution with Decay Function (HyDE-DF) demonstrated the capacity to obtain extremely competitive results, being on average 3% better than the second-best method while boasting between around 2× and 10× the speed of other methods. These insights become highly valuable in time-sensitive areas, where obtaining results in a shorter amount of time is crucial for maintaining system operational capabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduardo Gomes & Lucas Pereira & Augusto Esteves & Hugo Morais, 2024. "Metaheuristic Optimization Methods in Energy Community Scheduling: A Benchmark Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:2968-:d:1416169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/12/2968/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/12/2968/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:2968-:d:1416169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.